0
What was one of the points that the federalists stressed in the federalist papers?
Wiki User
∙ 12y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What are the main points of the anti federalist?
The Federalist papers 30-36 concern Taxation; and the modes and limits. Number 35 addresses several points but it is all under a single reference point that "The federal power to tax is limited to specific objects of taxation" quoting that source.
What were the two key points that the Federalist Papers tried to convince people of?
First, the authors explained that a strong government was needed for a variety of reasons, but especially if the United States was to be able to act effectively in foreign affairs. Second, they tried to convince readers that because of the "separation" of powers in the central government, there was little chance of the national government evolving into a tyrannical power. Instead of growing ever stronger, the separate branches would provide checks and balances against each other so that none could rise to complete dominance.
What were the key points that the federalist papers tried to convince people of?
First, the authors explained that a strong government was needed for a variety of reasons, but especially if the United States was to be able to act effectively in foreign affairs. Second, they tried to convince readers that because of the "separation" of powers in the central government, there was little chance of the national government evolving into a tyrannical power. Instead of growing ever stronger, the separate branches would provide checks and balances against each other so that none could rise to complete dominance.
What is federalist paper no 78 about?
Hamilton was trying to downplay the Anti-Federalists fears of a too-powerful Supreme Court. The main points are that the Judicial Branch would be the least powerful branch because it has no powers over the budget and policy, nor any enforcement powers--those being delegated to the Legislature and Executive respectively. Additionally, that a judiciary with life terms is necessary for the independence of that branch from the others. And lastly, though it is not in the Constitution, he spells out the assumption that the Court would have the power of Judicial Review--the only protection for maintaining a limiting Constitution is the ability to nullify the actions of the other branches when they exceed their mandates.
What were the two purposes of the Federalist Papers?
There was one main purpose-- Because of the extreme controversy over the ratification of the constitution among the states, and in particular, New York (Alexander Hamilton's state), AH decided that extreme action needed to be taken in order to convince the New York people that the constitution was valid and would not usurp the authority of state government (though many of his wishes for the federal government would have done that). He recruited James Madison and John Jay to help him publish in many of the newspapers of New York four times a week. The eighty-five letters addressed conflicts by interpreting the constitution so that it could be understood and the motives behind the declarations were made clear. Several points were made in these papers that were not directly stated in the constitution (which addressed New York itself, assuaging its fears particularly), and eventually New York was convinced.
What are the main points of the anti federalist?
The Federalist papers 30-36 concern Taxation; and the modes and limits. Number 35 addresses several points but it is all under a single reference point that "The federal power to tax is limited to specific objects of taxation" quoting that source.
What are the main points of Anti Federalist paper number 35?
The Federalist papers 30-36 concern Taxation; and the modes and limits. Number 35 addresses several points but it is all under a single reference point that "The federal power to tax is limited to specific objects of taxation" quoting that source.
Was there an equal representation of federalist and anti-federalist points of view in the Constitutional Convention?
Federalist (fed er a list ) a federalist is a supporter of a strong national government and in favor of adopting of the constitution.
What were the view points on the federalists?
The Federalists supported strong federal/central government, while the antifederalists wanted strong state government.
What is the relevance of arguments or points made by the federalist and anti federalist to contemporary events under the present government?
Anti-federalists today feel the federal government has taken on too much power. Federal government has utilized the "elastic clause", interpretation of laws, and expanded powers to serve their best interests. Federalists feel they have justified by having the federal government take control when individual states could not have, (ie: September 11th, homeland security, recent economic crisis, international trade, Pearl Harbor, Cuban Missile Crisis, Stock market crash and depression, FDR and the new deal)
What are the stress points of various human bones?
The spine is the most stressed point on the human back others are unknown
What is the purpose of having headings in position papers?
The headings support the points made in the thesis statement.
What were some of the basic points that the federalists used to defend the sedition act?
The most obvious - They thought it would help aliens from sneaking into America.
The Anti-Federalists centered their opposition to the Constitution on what two points?
because of the greatly increased powers of the central government and the lack of a bill of rights.
Why was the Virginia plan important?
The main points of the Virginia Plan were implemented into the United StatesConstitution. It was a federalist plan, a strong central government. It divided thefederal govt. into three sections, legislative, judiciary and executive. It called for abicameral legislature, the lower house would be elected by the citizens of eachstate, the upper house would be appointed from a list of nominees from eachstate. Both houses were to be proportional to the sizes of the state. The executivewas more like a prime minister than a president, he was to be elected by thelegislature. This plan helped to settle arguments between Federalists and Anti-Federalists.
Why was the Virginia plan?
The main points of the Virginia Plan were implemented into the United StatesConstitution. It was a federalist plan, a strong central government. It divided thefederal govt. into three sections, legislative, judiciary and executive. It called for abicameral legislature, the lower house would be elected by the citizens of eachstate, the upper house would be appointed from a list of nominees from eachstate. Both houses were to be proportional to the sizes of the state. The executivewas more like a prime minister than a president, he was to be elected by thelegislature. This plan helped to settle arguments between Federalists and Anti-Federalists.
How did the arguments of the Federalists and Anti Federalists reflect their points of view regarding natural rights republicanism and constitutionalism?
The federalist are those who favored a stronger national government due to their fear caused by the weak Articles of Confederation. Therefore, they were more loose constructionist meaning that they took the words of the constitution loosely so that the federal government has more opportunity. The anti-federalist were strong believers in natural rights and the rights of the states to determine what they wanted because each state was extremely different. Anti-federalist still had a bad taste in their mouth from the American Revolution and feared that a strong federal government would turn into a monarchy. Therefore, the anti-federalist pushed for the Bill of Rights which helped the people keep some of their power. Americans had recently fought a war to secure their fundamental rights. The anti-federalist did not want a constitution that put those rights in jeopardy. They also were strict constructionist meaning that they interpreted the constitution word by word. The anti-federalist refused to sign the constitution until there was a promise of the bill of rights. Many Founding Fathers were influenced by Locke, his natural rights philosophy of inalienable rights: life, liberty, property regardless of wealth, social status or birth. If government failed to protect those rights the people had the rights to rebel and replace it.
