0
What was the courts decision as to whether congress power to regulate interstate commerce excluded similar state regulation?
Wiki User
∙ 7y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How did each of john marshall's 3 landmark decisions change the power of the supreme court?
Gibbons v. Ogden was the landmark decision which Supreme Court held that the power to regulate interstate commerce was actually granted to the Congress by Commerce Clause in Article I of the Constitution.
How did The decision in Gibson's vs. Ogden basically addressed what issue?
The decision in Gibbons v. Ogden addressed the issue of whether states have the authority to regulate interstate commerce or if that power belongs exclusively to the federal government. The ruling established that regulating interstate commerce is a federal power under the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution.
What was the supreme court case that overturned the munn V. Illinois?
The Supreme Court case that overturned Munn v. Illinois was Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railroad Co. v. Illinois (1886). In this case, the Supreme Court ruled that states could not regulate rates for interstate railroad traffic because it violated the Commerce Clause of the Constitution, which grants Congress the power to regulate interstate commerce. This decision limited the ability of states to regulate certain aspects of interstate commerce.
Which marshall court decision established the right of federal government to regulate interstate commerce?
Gibbons v. Ogden
What was the paul vs Virginia case of 1868?
The Paul v. Virginia case of 1868 was a landmark Supreme Court case that held that insurance transactions were not considered interstate commerce and therefore could be regulated by individual states. This decision essentially limited the reach of the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution in relation to insurance regulation.
Do you agree with Marshall's ruling that Gibbons had a right to compete with Ogden's ferry line?
Yes, Marshall's ruling in Gibbons v. Ogden affirmed that the federal government, not the states, had the authority to regulate interstate commerce, including ferry services. This decision established a precedent for federal regulation of commerce and laid the foundation for the expansion of federal power in regulating the economy.
Did the supreme courts decision in united staves v Lopez expand the power of congress outlined in the commerce clause?
No, the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Lopez did not expand the power of Congress outlined in the Commerce Clause. Instead, it limited Congress's power by ruling that the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990 was unconstitutional because it exceeded Congress's authority under the Commerce Clause. The decision reaffirmed the principle of federalism and the importance of maintaining a clear separation of powers.
What significant court ruling involved the insurance industry?
Contrary to its previous decision, the U.S. Supreme Court held in 1944 that insurance is commerce and that, when conducted across state lines, is interstate commerce and subject to federal laws.
Why did northern and southern delegates disagree over whether the new congress should have the commerce power?
The largest argument over commerce power being held by the new congress was do to slavery and foreign trade. The final decision was that congress must pass all bills with two-thirds vote.
Who won the case US v Lopez?
Lopez "won". Lopez was a high student who brought a gun into school. He was charged with violating Gun Free School Zone Act of 1990. He was tried and convicted. He appealed the decision, saying Congress didn't have a right to legislate guns in the way the did (through the interstate commerce clause). The appeals court agreed. The government appealed the appeals court decision to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court affirmed the appeals court ruling in a 5-4 decision (essentially overturning Lopez' conviction) saying that while Congress has broad powers under the commerce clause, that power was not limitless.
What was the Supreme Court's decision in the case of NLRB v. Jones and Laughlin Steel Corporation?
National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corporation, 301 U.S. 1 (1937)The case was to determine if the National Labor Relations Act of 1935 was constitutional.NLRB was upheld. Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes wrote, "Although activities may be intrastate in character when separately considered, if they have such a close and substantial relation to interstate commerce that their control is essential or appropriate to protect that commerce from burdens and obstructions, Congress cannot be denied the power to exercise that control." Their decision reversed a lower court ruling.
What did the interstate commerce commission regulate?
The Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) regulated commercial transportation between the states: railroads, trucking, shipping, air freight; basically it regulated anything that moved goods. It originally started with the growth and development of railroads during the 19th century. The railroads in general were owned by fabulously wealthy investors, since it took a vast amount of capital to lay tracks and purchase the expensive engines and cars, the "high technology" of their day. In return for vast investments, the railroads expected vast profits, and they engaged in all sorts of unsavory tactics that were unfair to their customers. The ICC was established in 1887 following a Supreme Court decision in favor of railroads that ONLY the U.S. government could regulate interstate commerce, another blow against State's Rights. The U.S. Constitution only says the following about interstate commerce, describing the power of Congress: "To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes". Everything else that has come after is the result of legislation and court decisions.
