Poor Aztecs wore old cloths or other animal skins. Wealthier Aztecs had rich silks and clothing made of bright feathers.
Aztec's city life was reserved for the rich nobles. They even had slaves who worked for them. Any poor Aztec in the city had to work all the time in order to survive.
The differences between the poor houses and the rich houses were that the poor houses did not have fancy rooms or anything like that and the rich houses had store room lovely kitchen they had much better things then the poor houses
The differences between the poor houses and the rich houses were that the poor houses did not have fancy rooms or anything like that and the rich houses had store room lovely kitchen they had much better things then the poor houses
Poor Aztecs wore old fibre clothing. As the could noot afford to buy clean and proper fibre clothings
Rich Romans lived in amazing houses poor Romans didn't. Rich Romans ate delectable food poor Romans didn't rich Romans had money poor ones didn't rich ones didn't work poor ones did but there is a difference between poor Romans and slaves were people who were very poor and were owned. and if you want to learn the difference between slaves and rich people or poor people and slaves i recommend going on to wikipedia it is a very advanced website that has about 20 A4 pages about every single precise subject.
there is a big difference poor fashion is off brand or not so popular anymore like last seasons clothes and rich fashion is most popular like one of a kind or made just for you they cost a lot! trust me i know!!! <3 ~ Baybeegirl21
Everyone. The rich, the poor, and everyone in between.
womens dresses are made of silk where poor dresses are made of wool
=== === === === === ===
a shop
they were poor
The rich generally have more economic and political power than the poor.
poor people could not efford things to survive
the poor where misteated by the rich because the rich always looked down on poor people:)
rich poor have food don't have food can play have a job
its the difference between good and poor english
reactivity