0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Who were the elected officials of the Roman Empire?
The consuls were the top in the Roman Republic and there duties were to head the army and run the government. Also there were two consuls and they could veto another. This kept things in the republic straight and in align.
How many positions were there in the Roman government?
During the Roman Republic there were five types of executive officers of state: the consuls, praetors, censors, aediles and quaestors.
Who were the chief magistrates of the roman republic?
The chief magistrates of the Roman Republic were censors, consuls, praetors, curule aediles, and quaestors. The ranks they were divided into depended on their power.
What is an elected official in rome?
During the period of the Roman Republic there were five types of executive officers of state who were elected: the consuls, praetors, censors, aediles and quaestors.
What were roman judges that ruled in all legal matters called?
The Roman judges were called "praetors".
Did consul serve as judges in rome?
The consuls serve as judges in the early period of the Roman Republic, from 509 B.C. (the year of the establishment of the republic) to 366 B.C., when the praetors were created to relieve the consuls of their judicial duties. The praetors were chief justices in charge of the implementation of the law in courts. They presided over some trials. For other trials they instructed judges (judeces). In addition they also had the power to command an army.
What Two kinds of roman magistrates and the jobs they did?
During there were two higher magistrates, the consuls and the praetors. The two annually elected consuls were the heads of the city and the army. The praetors were like chief justices and also, like the consuls, held imperium, which mean they could command the armies, which they did when more generals were needed. The praetor urbanus (urban praetor) presided over civil cases between Roman citizens and the administration of justice. They also issued the Praetor's Edict, which stated the praetor's policy on judicial matters for his term of office. Praetors endorsed much of the content of previous edicts, thus ensuring continuity. Although praetors could not introduce new laws, they could make amendments. These introduced needed innovations. Therefore, the development an improvement of Roman law owed a lot to the praetors. Since the praetors were politicians, not lawyers, they often submitted consulta (written questions) to jurists (legal experts) and their replies were often used for the compilation of the edicts. Another type of praetor was the praetor peregrinus, which roughly means chief justice for foreigners. He presided over civil cases between Roman citizens and non-Romans. Non- Romans were given the protection of Roman law under the principles of the ius gentium (law of nations). Nation was the Latin term for ethic groups. The concept of this law was that justice comes from the human mind, rather than from ethnicity. Therefore, the non-Romans of the empire were entitled the protection of Roman law in disputes with Romans.
What are two kinds of Roman magistrates and the jobs they did?
During there were two higher magistrates, the consuls and the praetors. The two annually elected consuls were the heads of the city and the army. The praetors were like chief justices and also, like the consuls, held imperium, which mean they could command the armies, which they did when more generals were needed. The praetor urbanus (urban praetor) presided over civil cases between Roman citizens and the administration of justice. They also issued the Praetor's Edict, which stated the praetor's policy on judicial matters for his term of office. Praetors endorsed much of the content of previous edicts, thus ensuring continuity. Although praetors could not introduce new laws, they could make amendments. These introduced needed innovations. Therefore, the development an improvement of Roman law owed a lot to the praetors. Since the praetors were politicians, not lawyers, they often submitted consulta (written questions) to jurists (legal experts) and their replies were often used for the compilation of the edicts. Another type of praetor was the praetor peregrinus, which roughly means chief justice for foreigners. He presided over civil cases between Roman citizens and non-Romans. Non- Romans were given the protection of Roman law under the principles of the ius gentium (law of nations). Nation was the Latin term for ethic groups. The concept of this law was that justice comes from the human mind, rather than from ethnicity. Therefore, the non-Romans of the empire were entitled the protection of Roman law in disputes with Romans.
What was the three part government of rome called?
Rome's tripartite government is a modern revision of history. If you read about the Roman republic you can't help but see that it was a bipartite government. They did not have three branches of government. They had two branches of government, the Senate and the Roman People" (SPQR) Although they had Praetors, who were judges, the praetors were members of the senate and had other duties as well. For example, they could govern a province and raise an army. These were the identical powers of the consuls. There was no separate judicial branch of government in ancient Rome.Rome's tripartite government is a modern revision of history. If you read about the Roman republic you can't help but see that it was a bipartite government. They did not have three branches of government. They had two branches of government, the Senate and the Roman People" (SPQR) Although they had Praetors, who were judges, the praetors were members of the senate and had other duties as well. For example, they could govern a province and raise an army. These were the identical powers of the consuls. There was no separate judicial branch of government in ancient Rome.Rome's tripartite government is a modern revision of history. If you read about the Roman republic you can't help but see that it was a bipartite government. They did not have three branches of government. They had two branches of government, the Senate and the Roman People" (SPQR) Although they had Praetors, who were judges, the praetors were members of the senate and had other duties as well. For example, they could govern a province and raise an army. These were the identical powers of the consuls. There was no separate judicial branch of government in ancient Rome.Rome's tripartite government is a modern revision of history. If you read about the Roman republic you can't help but see that it was a bipartite government. They did not have three branches of government. They had two branches of government, the Senate and the Roman People" (SPQR) Although they had Praetors, who were judges, the praetors were members of the senate and had other duties as well. For example, they could govern a province and raise an army. These were the identical powers of the consuls. There was no separate judicial branch of government in ancient Rome.Rome's tripartite government is a modern revision of history. If you read about the Roman republic you can't help but see that it was a bipartite government. They did not have three branches of government. They had two branches of government, the Senate and the Roman People" (SPQR) Although they had Praetors, who were judges, the praetors were members of the senate and had other duties as well. For example, they could govern a province and raise an army. These were the identical powers of the consuls. There was no separate judicial branch of government in ancient Rome.Rome's tripartite government is a modern revision of history. If you read about the Roman republic you can't help but see that it was a bipartite government. They did not have three branches of government. They had two branches of government, the Senate and the Roman People" (SPQR) Although they had Praetors, who were judges, the praetors were members of the senate and had other duties as well. For example, they could govern a province and raise an army. These were the identical powers of the consuls. There was no separate judicial branch of government in ancient Rome.Rome's tripartite government is a modern revision of history. If you read about the Roman republic you can't help but see that it was a bipartite government. They did not have three branches of government. They had two branches of government, the Senate and the Roman People" (SPQR) Although they had Praetors, who were judges, the praetors were members of the senate and had other duties as well. For example, they could govern a province and raise an army. These were the identical powers of the consuls. There was no separate judicial branch of government in ancient Rome.Rome's tripartite government is a modern revision of history. If you read about the Roman republic you can't help but see that it was a bipartite government. They did not have three branches of government. They had two branches of government, the Senate and the Roman People" (SPQR) Although they had Praetors, who were judges, the praetors were members of the senate and had other duties as well. For example, they could govern a province and raise an army. These were the identical powers of the consuls. There was no separate judicial branch of government in ancient Rome.Rome's tripartite government is a modern revision of history. If you read about the Roman republic you can't help but see that it was a bipartite government. They did not have three branches of government. They had two branches of government, the Senate and the Roman People" (SPQR) Although they had Praetors, who were judges, the praetors were members of the senate and had other duties as well. For example, they could govern a province and raise an army. These were the identical powers of the consuls. There was no separate judicial branch of government in ancient Rome.
Does the two counsuls have to do with the roman republic?
Yes, the two consuls were the top elected officials in the Roman republic.Yes, the two consuls were the top elected officials in the Roman republic.Yes, the two consuls were the top elected officials in the Roman republic.Yes, the two consuls were the top elected officials in the Roman republic.Yes, the two consuls were the top elected officials in the Roman republic.Yes, the two consuls were the top elected officials in the Roman republic.Yes, the two consuls were the top elected officials in the Roman republic.Yes, the two consuls were the top elected officials in the Roman republic.Yes, the two consuls were the top elected officials in the Roman republic.
On What is government based?
Roman. Like Rome, we're a tripartite, three part, government. We have three branches, Legislative, Executive, and Judicial, whereas Rome had Senate and the Assembly of Centuries (Legislative), Consuls (Executive), and Praetors (Judicial).
What government is based on agreements?
Roman. Like Rome, we're a tripartite, three part, government. We have three branches, Legislative, Executive, and Judicial, whereas Rome had Senate and the Assembly of Centuries (Legislative), Consuls (Executive), and Praetors (Judicial).
