That would be Nicholas II, who abdicated for himself AND his son in 1917. He and his family were killed by the Bolsheviks afterwards.
The Czar rule in Russia lasted nearly 300 years. The first Czar was put into power in 1613 and the last Russian Czar ended his reign in 1917.
Tsar Nicholas Romanov II.
Tsar Nicholas II of Russia, along with his wife, 5 children and 4 servants, was executed on June 17, 1917. Nicholas was the last tsar to rule the Russian Empire and the end of the 304-year Romanov dynasty.
Trotsky used his pen to oppose the rule of Czar Nicholas II.
Though it is commonly believed that Nikolas II was the last czar of Russia, that information MAY be incorrect.Nikolas II abdicated his throne in 1917. Because he was not assassinated or overthrown the throne should have gone to his son Alexei, the rightful heir. But, Nikolas abdicated for his son, "although there is a question about whether he had the legal right to do this well."Grand Duke Michael Romanov had lost the right to become czar when he was married without the consent of Czar Nikolas II, but Nikolas abdicated in his favor. Michael realized the throne would never be safe unless the people wanted a monarchy. A few hours after Nikolas and Alexei's abdication, Michael signed a manifesto explaining that he would only become czar if through an election at the Constituent Assembly the people agreed to a monarchy. This election never occurred and so Michael refused to be czar.So since Nikolas II did indeed legally abdicate his throne, he certainly isn't the last czar. The question is whether Alexei really was the last czar or if Michael II truly was the last czar of Russia.Actual Fact:Even if Nicholas II had legally abdicated the throne, he remains the last Czar of Russia, because no one else was crowned or acted as Czar.Nicholas II was indeed the last Tsar for exactly the reasons stated above. The answer states that Mikhail refused to become Czar, so how could he be considered the last Czar?The Russian Law of Succession stated that the throne was not the Emperor's personal property to do with as he pleased. Title descended automatically to the eldest son. The Grand Duke Michael was not the eldest son and to complicate things more, he had disqualified himself from being Tsar by marrying a commoner. Since Mikhail refused to accept the appointment, was never crowned Czar (or Emperor) and never acted as Czar, he cannot be considered the last Czar. In fact, the abdication to Mikhail was illegal and of no effect.Similarly for Alexei, the abdication was not to him, but even if it had been to him, he was never crowned Czar and never acted as Czar.It is also arguable that Nicholas II's voluntary abdication of his position was in and of itself illegal and of no effect. Thus, it can be looked at as Nicholas II abdicating the right to rule the country but that he was still the Tsar until his death.The question of the legality of the abdication was serious enough to suggest that Nicholas II might be restored to the throne at some time in the future, had he lived and political conditions changed. One thing is fairly certain. Had the monarchist forces succeeded in overthrowing the new Bolshevik regime, they would certainly have put Nicholas II back on the throne, rather than Mikhail or Alexei.If Mikhail or Alexei were the true last Czars of Russia, one of them would have had to be restored to the throne, not Nicholas II.
The Czar rule in Russia lasted nearly 300 years. The first Czar was put into power in 1613 and the last Russian Czar ended his reign in 1917.
Tsar Nicholas Romanov II.
After the Time of Troubles, Michael Romanov was elected tsar in 1613. His rule began the Romanov dynasty that ruled until 1917.
Russia
An Autocrat rule of Imperial Russia.
The daughters of the Czar and Czarina of Russia were styled Grand Duchesses. The sons where referred to as Czarevitch.
Russia was ruled by Tsar Nicholas Romanov II. He had absolute powers and rules with no parliament or advisory. The Russian people had no say in the government and couldn't debate any issues freely. This is why there were two rebellions and revolutions in Russia, during Nicholas' rule.
In the early 20th century. From 1894 to 1917.
Yes They ruled from 1614 when Michael Romanov was put on the throne to 1917 when Nichols II stepped down from it.
The houses of Rurik and Romanov ruled over Russia.
You need to answer this question question because we don’t do homework. You need to describe the Czarist Russia.
Because they wanted to kill off the whole Romanov family so they're would never be another Tsar to rule Russia.