0
McDonald v. City of Chicago, 561 US ___ (2010)
McDonald v. City of Chicago, 561 US ___ (2010) The US Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case on March 2, 2010, and released its opinion on June 28, 2010. The Court held self-protection is a fundamental right, and incorporated the Second Amendment to the States via the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause.
District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 US ___ (2008)
In 2008, the US Supreme Court upheld Second Amendment protection in the case District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 US ___ (2008), by striking down a District of Columbia law that unconstitutionally restricted the use and storage of legally owned guns. The decision in Heller applied only to the District of Columbia, which is federal territory, and not to the states, which did not become bound by the Second Amendment until June 2010.
For more information, see Related Questions, below.
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
The supreme courts ruling in brown v board of education of topeka was an important step in?
the civil rights movement.
The Supreme Court's ruling in Brown v. Board of Education was an important step in?
The Civil Rights Movement
What is a conservative Supreme Court most likely to do?
A conservative member of the supreme court is likely to make a ruling against immigration,against abortion rights and against tightening gun laws.
What ruling has the supreme court made for demonstrations on private property?
The ruling made by the supreme court is that demonstrations on the private property is illegal.
What is the current decision of gay rights among the Supreme Court Justices?
There is no gay rights ruling by the U.S. Supreme court, other than the repeal of section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act, which was a 5-4 vote in favor of repeal.
What reason did the Supreme Court give for its ruling that Dred Scott a black man could not be a citizen of the US?
That blacks were inferior and had no rights
What events marked the beginning and end of the modern civil rights movement?
the 1954 Supreme Court ruling the made segregation unconstitutional
What happens when the US Supreme Court agrees with the lower court ruling?
If the US Supreme Court agrees with the lower court ruling, the decision is "affirmed," and becomes legally final (res judicata).
Can congressional nullification overturn the ruling of the supreme court?
No the Congress can not nullify a ruling of the Supreme Court. The Congress would have to rewrite the law which the Supreme Court had declared unconstitutional. Then the new law could overrule the Supreme Court IF the new law was declared constitutional if/when appealed.
How did Supreme Court rule in cases affecting the rights of Chinese immigrants?
The supreme court ruled in cases affecting the rights of Chinese immigrants in a fair manner. In its ruling, the supreme court that the number of Chinese immigrants coming into the country should be limited. However, any Chinese immigrants who were in the country would have security of tenure in their jobs.
How did the Supreme Court rule in the case affecting the rights of Chinese immigrants?
The supreme court ruled in cases affecting the rights of Chinese immigrants in a fair manner. In its ruling, the supreme court that the number of Chinese immigrants coming into the country should be limited. However, any Chinese immigrants who were in the country would have security of tenure in their jobs.
How did the Supreme Court rules in cases affecting the rights of Chinese immigrants?
The supreme court ruled in cases affecting the rights of Chinese immigrants in a fair manner. In its ruling, the supreme court that the number of Chinese immigrants coming into the country should be limited. However, any Chinese immigrants who were in the country would have security of tenure in their jobs.
