0
What was the senate that cast the vote needed to ratify the constitution?
Wiki User
∙ 8y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What are the functions of the president of the senate?
The Senate, as one house of Congress, has the powers outlined in Article I, section 8 of the Constitution. The Senate has several exclusive powers that are also mentioned in Article One. The Senate must approve treaties with other nations; major appointments of the President, like ambassadors and members of the federal judiciary, must be approved by the Senate; the Senate acts as the jury in impeachment cases and to be removed from office, the impeached officer must be convicted by a two-thirds vote in the Senate.
What are arguments for changing the way the Electoral College works?
The main argument for making a change to the Electoral College is that it allows for a winner of the popular vote to lose the presidential election. However, two things need to be answered. If the Electoral College system is so bad, why does it still exist? There have been a few hundred years to alter it. Secondly, as with the US Senate, a small state has the same weight in the US Senate as a large state. It's clear the Framers believed that the states, the "mother" of the US Constitution, should cast their Electoral Votes, all of them to the winner of a state. The formula to change this is an amendment to the Constitution.
Who approved the laws of Ancient Rome?
The Senate proposed a law, then voting assemblies cast their vote. In a different time of Ancient Rome, the Emperor proposed a law and the Senate either denied or passed it.
What does tripartite government and checks and balances mean on the Roman Republic of Ancient Rome meant?
Tripartite government has no meaning for the government of ancient Rome because they did not have anything like it. Rome had a bipartite government which consisted of the senate and the Roman people. S.P.Q.R. The Senate was the body that proposed the laws and the people, via the assemblies, passed the proposals into law. (At least that was the way it was supposed to work.) However they did have a "check and balance" type of system in the election of the tribunes, who were able to cast a veto on any proposal they considered negative.Tripartite government has no meaning for the government of ancient Rome because they did not have anything like it. Rome had a bipartite government which consisted of the senate and the Roman people. S.P.Q.R. The Senate was the body that proposed the laws and the people, via the assemblies, passed the proposals into law. (At least that was the way it was supposed to work.) However they did have a "check and balance" type of system in the election of the tribunes, who were able to cast a veto on any proposal they considered negative.Tripartite government has no meaning for the government of ancient Rome because they did not have anything like it. Rome had a bipartite government which consisted of the senate and the Roman people. S.P.Q.R. The Senate was the body that proposed the laws and the people, via the assemblies, passed the proposals into law. (At least that was the way it was supposed to work.) However they did have a "check and balance" type of system in the election of the tribunes, who were able to cast a veto on any proposal they considered negative.Tripartite government has no meaning for the government of ancient Rome because they did not have anything like it. Rome had a bipartite government which consisted of the senate and the Roman people. S.P.Q.R. The Senate was the body that proposed the laws and the people, via the assemblies, passed the proposals into law. (At least that was the way it was supposed to work.) However they did have a "check and balance" type of system in the election of the tribunes, who were able to cast a veto on any proposal they considered negative.Tripartite government has no meaning for the government of ancient Rome because they did not have anything like it. Rome had a bipartite government which consisted of the senate and the Roman people. S.P.Q.R. The Senate was the body that proposed the laws and the people, via the assemblies, passed the proposals into law. (At least that was the way it was supposed to work.) However they did have a "check and balance" type of system in the election of the tribunes, who were able to cast a veto on any proposal they considered negative.Tripartite government has no meaning for the government of ancient Rome because they did not have anything like it. Rome had a bipartite government which consisted of the senate and the Roman people. S.P.Q.R. The Senate was the body that proposed the laws and the people, via the assemblies, passed the proposals into law. (At least that was the way it was supposed to work.) However they did have a "check and balance" type of system in the election of the tribunes, who were able to cast a veto on any proposal they considered negative.Tripartite government has no meaning for the government of ancient Rome because they did not have anything like it. Rome had a bipartite government which consisted of the senate and the Roman people. S.P.Q.R. The Senate was the body that proposed the laws and the people, via the assemblies, passed the proposals into law. (At least that was the way it was supposed to work.) However they did have a "check and balance" type of system in the election of the tribunes, who were able to cast a veto on any proposal they considered negative.Tripartite government has no meaning for the government of ancient Rome because they did not have anything like it. Rome had a bipartite government which consisted of the senate and the Roman people. S.P.Q.R. The Senate was the body that proposed the laws and the people, via the assemblies, passed the proposals into law. (At least that was the way it was supposed to work.) However they did have a "check and balance" type of system in the election of the tribunes, who were able to cast a veto on any proposal they considered negative.Tripartite government has no meaning for the government of ancient Rome because they did not have anything like it. Rome had a bipartite government which consisted of the senate and the Roman people. S.P.Q.R. The Senate was the body that proposed the laws and the people, via the assemblies, passed the proposals into law. (At least that was the way it was supposed to work.) However they did have a "check and balance" type of system in the election of the tribunes, who were able to cast a veto on any proposal they considered negative.
What number was Maryland when it was admitted to the union?
The usual number assigned to Maryland is SEVENTH. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_by_date_of_statehood But note: 1) it was not "admitted" --that term only applies to states added AFTER the original 13 2) the count given for the early states is misleading since the Constitution did not go into effect at all until the required 2/3 (9 of the original 13) had ratified it. So at least the first nine (including Maryland) would all be included under the Constitution at the same time. For all practical purposes, since votes 9 to 11 happened so close together that (#10 & 11 did not even know the 9th vote had already been cast), it was not even possible to officially put the Constitution into effect till after the first 11 had ratified it. Thinking of this in terms of elections (the first measure of participating in the federal government), of the original 13, only North Carolina and Rhode Island did not ratify in time to participate in the first Presidential election and to immediately send representatives to the first Congress under the new Constitution.
What is the capital of new hemisphere the state which cast the deciding vote to ratify the Constitution?
What is the capital of new hemisphere the state which cast the deciding vote to ratify the constitution
What is the capital of new hamapshire the state that cast the deciding vote to ratify the the constitution?
Concord is the capital city of New Hampshire.
What is the capital is New Hampshire the state which cast the deciding vote to ratify the constitution?
Concord is the capital city in New Hampshire.
What is the capital of new of New Hampshire the state that cast the vote to ratify the constitution?
Concord is the capital city of New Hampshire.
What is the capital of new hampsher the state which cast the deciding vote to ratify the constitution?
Concord is the capital city of New Hampshire.
What is the capital of new Hampshire's state that cast the deciding vote to ratify the constitution?
Concord is the capital city of New Hampshire.
What is the capital of New York Hampshire the state which cast the deciding vote to ratify the constitution?
Concord is the capital city of New Hampshire.
What is the capital of New Hampshire the state that cast the deciding vote to ratify the constitution answer com?
Concord is the capital city of New Hampshire.
What is the capital of New Hepihsirethe state which cast the deciding vote ratify the constitution?
Concord is the capital city in the U.S. state of New Hampshire.
What is the capital of new hemisphere the state cast the deciding vote to ratify the constitution?
Concord is the capital city in the U.S. state of New Hampshire.
What is the capital of New Hampshire the state that cast the deciding vote to ratify the constitution constituti?
Concord is the capital city in the U.S. state of New Hampshire.
What is the formal duty of the vice president?
A formal duty assigned to the vice president by the Constitution is to preside over the Senate. Specifically, his role is to cast a vote when a Senate deadlock occurs. Plus, he is also assigned to give certification on the official vote count of the U.S. Electoral College.
