(In the Battle of Tours) Because of the Arab's sword shape, they would only try to slash at their enemies. The Arab sword was curved while the Frank's swords were straight and heavy. The Arab sword was easier to wield but the Frank sword would be able to pierce and you could hit people with it and it would break bones. So to answer your question directly, the slashing tactic was to just run in and slash their enemy's in battle, pretty much just swinging your sword around.
The tortoise formation was a battle tactic. It was used in any situation where overhead protection was required, such as in the siege of a city.
slashing hose
Fire ships where used. They were ship set on fire then pushed of into the middle of the Spanish Armada
Maori's. New zealand natives used this tactic of battle against the english in the mid to late 1800's
There are many tactics that the VietCong used in the Vietnam war. The most common tactic used was surprise attacks and ambushes due to extensive tunneling underground.
Vicksburg.
No, tactics and formations are not strictly the same even though they are often used interchangeably. A formation was a structure of sorts, such as the square formation or the tortoise formation. A tactic was how the formation was used or moved around or dropped back. A tactic could be likened to a battle plan.No, tactics and formations are not strictly the same even though they are often used interchangeably. A formation was a structure of sorts, such as the square formation or the tortoise formation. A tactic was how the formation was used or moved around or dropped back. A tactic could be likened to a battle plan.No, tactics and formations are not strictly the same even though they are often used interchangeably. A formation was a structure of sorts, such as the square formation or the tortoise formation. A tactic was how the formation was used or moved around or dropped back. A tactic could be likened to a battle plan.No, tactics and formations are not strictly the same even though they are often used interchangeably. A formation was a structure of sorts, such as the square formation or the tortoise formation. A tactic was how the formation was used or moved around or dropped back. A tactic could be likened to a battle plan.No, tactics and formations are not strictly the same even though they are often used interchangeably. A formation was a structure of sorts, such as the square formation or the tortoise formation. A tactic was how the formation was used or moved around or dropped back. A tactic could be likened to a battle plan.No, tactics and formations are not strictly the same even though they are often used interchangeably. A formation was a structure of sorts, such as the square formation or the tortoise formation. A tactic was how the formation was used or moved around or dropped back. A tactic could be likened to a battle plan.No, tactics and formations are not strictly the same even though they are often used interchangeably. A formation was a structure of sorts, such as the square formation or the tortoise formation. A tactic was how the formation was used or moved around or dropped back. A tactic could be likened to a battle plan.No, tactics and formations are not strictly the same even though they are often used interchangeably. A formation was a structure of sorts, such as the square formation or the tortoise formation. A tactic was how the formation was used or moved around or dropped back. A tactic could be likened to a battle plan.No, tactics and formations are not strictly the same even though they are often used interchangeably. A formation was a structure of sorts, such as the square formation or the tortoise formation. A tactic was how the formation was used or moved around or dropped back. A tactic could be likened to a battle plan.
The tortoise formation was a battle tactic. It was used in any situation where overhead protection was required, such as in the siege of a city.
It depends on the battle tactic or plan being used by the general or leader of the forces.
slashing hose
Fire ships where used. They were ship set on fire then pushed of into the middle of the Spanish Armada
For the most part, the US Army's dominating battle tactic was what can be called the "turning movement". As used in the Mexican-American War it consisted of sending a detachment of forces away from the front lines and then attack the enemy's flank, causing panic and a retreat. Battles such as Monterrey and Cerro Gordo are examples of this tactic.
Maori's. New zealand natives used this tactic of battle against the english in the mid to late 1800's
The Second Battle of Bull Run ended the same results as the first battle. Perhaps the tactic that produced the definitive defeat of Union General John Pope, were the five divisions that assaulted Pope's southern flank. This drove the Union forces up the slopes of Henry House Hill. Certainly subsequent actions were important, however, the tactic mentioned was the beginning of the end of Pope's invasion.
A systematic approach is a way to handle a problem or situation. It's a carefully thought out plan to a problem. Sometimes used to refer to a tactic in battle.
Harold Godwinson lost the Battle of Hastings because they did not keep there shield wall. The Norman's used a tactic that faked a retreat and the Saxons ran after them. Then the Norman's turned around and thrashed them.
In the play Macbeth, the English forces use the tactic of camouflage by disguising themselves with foliage from Birnam Wood to hide their true numbers as they advance towards Macbeth's castle at Dunsinane. This tactic fulfills the witches' prophecy that Macbeth would be defeated when Birnam Wood comes to Dunsinane.