0
What was the style of the rule of Julius Caesar when he was appointed dictator for life?
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
Julius Caesar did not change his style of rule when he was appointed dictator for life in 44 BC. He was assassinated one month after his appointment. Moreover he had obtained the Dictatorship three times prior to this. He had himself first appointed dictator in 49 BC to preside over his own election as consul (head of the Republic and the army) and resigned from the post after 11 days. He then was appointed dictator for one year in 48 BC. Although this was more than the usual 6 months of the term of this office, it was not totally unprecedented. Another man, Sulla, had been appointed dictator for one year 33 years earlier. Caesar started braking the mould in 47 BC when he had himself appointed dictator for 10 years.
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What was Mussolini's style of rule?
Dictator, fascist
What was one weakness in Napoleon's leadership style?
He was a dictator.
Why do you think julius caesar has had such an impact on the world of theatre?
Caesar represents an attitude to governance which the conspirators, especially Brutus, want to eliminate. Like many another revolutionary, Brutus believed that if once Caesar were eliminated, the Roman Republic would return to the virtuous and noble style of government which it enjoyed in the time of his ancestor. Unfortunately the factors which led to Caesar's success would not die with him. They could kill Caesar but not the style of governance which he represents; that is carried on by Antony and Octavian, who ends up perfecting it.
What kind of ruler was josef Stalin?
Stalin was a Dictator. His government was a Communist-style government.
How did the periods following the rules of Julius Caesar and Augustus differ?
No, the two men both ruled autocratically. However the difference was in, shall we say, style. Julius was a very arrogant and impatient person more or less bulldozing his way through legislation and accepted every honor and form of flattery the senate could bestow on him. Augustus, on the other hand, was an astute politician and learned from Caesar's mistakes. He reigned himself in. He gave the appearance of a humble citizen, promoting traditional Roman values. He offered to give up his powers. He brought about the change in the government by using the institutions of the republic and not by a personal mandate as Caesar did.No, the two men both ruled autocratically. However the difference was in, shall we say, style. Julius was a very arrogant and impatient person more or less bulldozing his way through legislation and accepted every honor and form of flattery the senate could bestow on him. Augustus, on the other hand, was an astute politician and learned from Caesar's mistakes. He reigned himself in. He gave the appearance of a humble citizen, promoting traditional Roman values. He offered to give up his powers. He brought about the change in the government by using the institutions of the republic and not by a personal mandate as Caesar did.No, the two men both ruled autocratically. However the difference was in, shall we say, style. Julius was a very arrogant and impatient person more or less bulldozing his way through legislation and accepted every honor and form of flattery the senate could bestow on him. Augustus, on the other hand, was an astute politician and learned from Caesar's mistakes. He reigned himself in. He gave the appearance of a humble citizen, promoting traditional Roman values. He offered to give up his powers. He brought about the change in the government by using the institutions of the republic and not by a personal mandate as Caesar did.No, the two men both ruled autocratically. However the difference was in, shall we say, style. Julius was a very arrogant and impatient person more or less bulldozing his way through legislation and accepted every honor and form of flattery the senate could bestow on him. Augustus, on the other hand, was an astute politician and learned from Caesar's mistakes. He reigned himself in. He gave the appearance of a humble citizen, promoting traditional Roman values. He offered to give up his powers. He brought about the change in the government by using the institutions of the republic and not by a personal mandate as Caesar did.No, the two men both ruled autocratically. However the difference was in, shall we say, style. Julius was a very arrogant and impatient person more or less bulldozing his way through legislation and accepted every honor and form of flattery the senate could bestow on him. Augustus, on the other hand, was an astute politician and learned from Caesar's mistakes. He reigned himself in. He gave the appearance of a humble citizen, promoting traditional Roman values. He offered to give up his powers. He brought about the change in the government by using the institutions of the republic and not by a personal mandate as Caesar did.No, the two men both ruled autocratically. However the difference was in, shall we say, style. Julius was a very arrogant and impatient person more or less bulldozing his way through legislation and accepted every honor and form of flattery the senate could bestow on him. Augustus, on the other hand, was an astute politician and learned from Caesar's mistakes. He reigned himself in. He gave the appearance of a humble citizen, promoting traditional Roman values. He offered to give up his powers. He brought about the change in the government by using the institutions of the republic and not by a personal mandate as Caesar did.No, the two men both ruled autocratically. However the difference was in, shall we say, style. Julius was a very arrogant and impatient person more or less bulldozing his way through legislation and accepted every honor and form of flattery the senate could bestow on him. Augustus, on the other hand, was an astute politician and learned from Caesar's mistakes. He reigned himself in. He gave the appearance of a humble citizen, promoting traditional Roman values. He offered to give up his powers. He brought about the change in the government by using the institutions of the republic and not by a personal mandate as Caesar did.No, the two men both ruled autocratically. However the difference was in, shall we say, style. Julius was a very arrogant and impatient person more or less bulldozing his way through legislation and accepted every honor and form of flattery the senate could bestow on him. Augustus, on the other hand, was an astute politician and learned from Caesar's mistakes. He reigned himself in. He gave the appearance of a humble citizen, promoting traditional Roman values. He offered to give up his powers. He brought about the change in the government by using the institutions of the republic and not by a personal mandate as Caesar did.No, the two men both ruled autocratically. However the difference was in, shall we say, style. Julius was a very arrogant and impatient person more or less bulldozing his way through legislation and accepted every honor and form of flattery the senate could bestow on him. Augustus, on the other hand, was an astute politician and learned from Caesar's mistakes. He reigned himself in. He gave the appearance of a humble citizen, promoting traditional Roman values. He offered to give up his powers. He brought about the change in the government by using the institutions of the republic and not by a personal mandate as Caesar did.
What style of writing did Shakespeare use in Julius Caesar?
someone please answer the ouestion i dont no wat it is i wanted to no sorry :(
What was Julius' leadership style?
Future military skills as a young man. is completely wrong, there are only 4 types of real leadership styles and Caesar is strictly Autocratic
Was Julius Caesar a good Soilder?
Julius Caesar was a good soldier as far as his military and physical abilities were concerned. He was also a good general, with troops for the most part loyal to him. His style of fighting differed from the conventional in that it was unexpected and usually quick. He did careful reconnaissance work and it is said that his men were never ambushed. His personal courage was extraordinary.
What Julius Caesars leadership style?
Future military skills as a young man. is completely wrong, there are only 4 types of real leadership styles and Caesar is strictly Autocratic
What style of leader was Hitler?
A fascist dictator.
What was Mussolini's style of rule?
Dictator, fascist
What was one weakness in Napoleon's leadership style?
He was a dictator.
Why do you think julius caesar has had such an impact on the world of theatre?
Caesar represents an attitude to governance which the conspirators, especially Brutus, want to eliminate. Like many another revolutionary, Brutus believed that if once Caesar were eliminated, the Roman Republic would return to the virtuous and noble style of government which it enjoyed in the time of his ancestor. Unfortunately the factors which led to Caesar's success would not die with him. They could kill Caesar but not the style of governance which he represents; that is carried on by Antony and Octavian, who ends up perfecting it.
What description dictator. direction style?
A dictator is a ruler (e.g. absolutist or autocratic) who assumes sole and absolute power (sometimes, but not always, with military control sometimes with bribes) but without hereditary ascension such as an absolute monarch. When other states call the head of state of a particular state a dictator, that state is called a dictatorship. The word originated as the title of a magistrate in ancient Rome appointed by the Senate to rule the republic in times of emergency (see Roman dictator and justitium).
What is Idi Amin's leadership style?
He was a cruel dictator who killed many of his people.
What kind of ruler was josef Stalin?
Stalin was a Dictator. His government was a Communist-style government.
What was the responsibility of the committee of style?
An appointed committee meant to revise the style of, and arrange, the articles which have been agreed apon by The House
