checks and balances! next time read your book or actually search the web!
checks and balances
Having come from a monarchy in England, where all power was controlled by the king and nothing much could be done about it, the Founding Fathers became convinced that it was a bad idea for one branch of government to have all the power. Thus, they designed a system of checks and balances, where each branch served as a check on the power of the other branches, and no one person or branch (not even the president) could do whatever he wished.
The founding fathers did not want to vest too much power in any one branch of government. The power to declare war is one best left to a majority vote in the legislature.
The founding fathers include in the Constitution of power sovereignty to reinforce and reinstall the idea that the new United States were both soverign and independent. This in turn made it harder for Great Britian to exert any type of influence.
That the common man, or the rabble as they were considered would somehow use the power of Democracy to oust the gentry or landowners from their power.
Dividing the power was crucial to a proper balance, and to the protection of the freedoms of the citizenry. Currently we see the Executive branch in the US creating law out of thin air, radically changing that balance for the worst. Executive orders are one example of this. With any one branch in complete control, the checks and balances that were so carefully crafted are lost.
The system of checks and balances within the government keeps one branch from gaining power over another, thus reducing the risk that anyone branch (presidential/ legislative/ judicial) could gain power and create a dictatorship.
The founding fathers were more concerned about overreaching government power.
The Goverment Gets It's Power From "We The People". I Hope This Helped You!
The founding fathers separated the power to make, enforce, and interpret laws between different branches of government in order to prevent government becoming tyrannical.
Having come from a monarchy in England, where all power was controlled by the king and nothing much could be done about it, the Founding Fathers became convinced that it was a bad idea for one branch of government to have all the power. Thus, they designed a system of checks and balances, where each branch served as a check on the power of the other branches, and no one person or branch (not even the president) could do whatever he wished.
Because that is the method the Founding Fathers established.
The current (and recent) executive branch has taken much more power unto itself than is proper. Through the use of 'executive order' and other misused tools, the Executive branch as corrupted the careful balance of power and made itself supreme.
The founding fathers did not want to vest too much power in any one branch of government. The power to declare war is one best left to a majority vote in the legislature.
The founding fathers did not want to vest too much power in any one branch of government. The power to declare war is one best left to a majority vote in the legislature.
The Founding Fathers created the United States government in a way that would keep each branch of the government from having too much power. Each branch--Legislative, Executive, and Judicial--has power over the other two. This keeps the government from being controlled by one sole part of our country's government.
The Founding Fathers of our country and the Constitution (ie- George Washington, Benjamin Franklin, John Hancock, etc). they knew the government needed a system of checks and balances so that no one branch would gain too much power.
Yes, the Westminster System existed in the 1700s. It was somewhat different from the Westminster system of today in that the House of Lords and the King had much more power than they do today, but the general concept of a country generally ruled by Parliament did exist.The Founding Fathers rejected the Westminster System because they believed in the separation of powers. At that point in time, there were two general political philosophies, one in which power is concentrated in a leader or organization and the other in which leaders can check each other's power and diffuse the overall strength of the government. The Founding Fathers almost unanimously wanted the latter system to prevail. They were convinced that concentrating power in one body (Parliament) and one person (King George III) bred tyranny and only with a separation of powers could rights and freedoms be preserved.