During the Roman Republic executive officers of state of the same rank could veto each other's actions and officers of state of higher rank could veto the actions of officers of state of lower rank.
It is the idea of the power of veto.
Only the government of the Roman Republic (509-27 B.C.) had checks and balances. The government of the monarchy (753-509 B.C.) and of rule by emperors (27 B.C.-476 B.C.) did not. During the Roma republic officer of state of the same rank could veto each other and higher officers could veto the lower officers. This was to avoid abuse of power.
"veto" means 'I forbid', which is exactly how the term is used in international politics.
Because the power to veto would make so the Emperor did not have supreme power
Each council had the power to veto one another.
consul
They would have consul it
consul
It is the idea of the power of veto.
Only the government of the Roman Republic (509-27 B.C.) had checks and balances. The government of the monarchy (753-509 B.C.) and of rule by emperors (27 B.C.-476 B.C.) did not. During the Roma republic officer of state of the same rank could veto each other and higher officers could veto the lower officers. This was to avoid abuse of power.
consul
The only principle which has been incorporated into the US constitution is the power to veto.
All the Magistrates had the power of veto, they could veto the actions of all magistrates underneath them, but the Tribunes of the Plebs could veto all magistrates, including Consuls.
Only the government of the Roman Republic (509-27 B.C.) had checks and balances. The government of the monarchy (753-509 B.C.) and of rule by emperors (27 B.C.-476 B.C.) did not. During the Roma republic officer of state of the same rank could veto each other and higher officers could veto the lower officers. This was to avoid abuse of power.
power of veto
"veto" means 'I forbid', which is exactly how the term is used in international politics.
The Executive Branch has the power to veto legislation.