To answer a specific question, scientist form a hypothesis. If the hypothesis cannot be testable or answered, they'll give you a prediction of what will most likely happen from the results of the hypothesis.
To answer a specific question, scientist form a hypothesis. If the hypothesis cannot be testable or answered, they'll give you a prediction of what will most likely happen from the results of the hypothesis.
After forming a hypothesis, a scientist is most likely to conduct experiments to test the hypothesis. This involves designing a controlled experiment to gather data and observations that will either support or refute the hypothesis. Following the experiments, the scientist analyzes the results to draw conclusions and may refine the hypothesis or develop further experiments based on the findings.
After forming a hypothesis, a scientist is most likely to design and conduct experiments to test the hypothesis. This involves collecting data and making observations to determine whether the results support or refute the hypothesis. Based on the findings, the scientist may then analyze the data and draw conclusions, which could lead to further experimentation or the modification of the hypothesis.
This is because Protestants rejected indulgences and were mocked by how the church lied. They then had the idea of "what more was not true" these people became scientist who wanted the truth they preformed experiments and formed hypothesis to prove themselves correct.
After forming a hypothesis, a scientist is most likely to design and conduct experiments to test the hypothesis. This involves systematically collecting data and making observations to determine whether the hypothesis is supported or refuted. The results of these experiments will help the scientist draw conclusions and may lead to further testing or the development of new hypotheses.
The steps in the scientific method are: 1. The scientist asks a question. 2. The scientist develops a hypothesis (an educated guess). 3. The scientist tests the hypothesis. 4. The scientist determines whether the hypothesis is correct. 5. The scientist records the steps, so that others can repeat them to see if they obtain the same results. In my opinion, the most important step is the first. We would not be able to make any new discoveries, without someone asking a question.
The most important reason is if a single scientist forms a hypothesis and it is proved by his or her experiment it is still only a hypothesis. Other scientists need to repeat the experiment in every way conceivable to either prove or disprove the hypothesis. Only after the hypothesis has stood up to such scrutiny may it become a theory recognized by the scientific community. Another reason is that some research is simply too daunting and complex for a single person to complete.
Do you mean "what are"? If so, I would think hypothesis and conclusion...
Most of the time they write down what they are going to do, what they think will happen judging on what they are using. Then they go from there
Yes. But usually a hypothesis (if, then, because statement) is changed overtime to establish a conclusion on the investigation. The point of the collection of the data is to show whether or not the hypothesis was supported, and if not needs to be corrected/modified. Certain parts may still be helpful/kept but in most cases it is changed
Alfred Wegener is most like Albert Einstein.Both of their discoveries were rejected.Both of them had hypothesis no one really cared about - no offenseBoth of them became known as one of History's greatest scientist