answersLogoWhite

0

Asia?Europe? I'm only in 5th grade!

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

How can a scientist test a hypothesis if its impossible to control the experiment?

To answer a specific question, scientist form a hypothesis. If the hypothesis cannot be testable or answered, they'll give you a prediction of what will most likely happen from the results of the hypothesis.


How scientist try to answer questions that cannot be tested with experiments?

To answer a specific question, scientist form a hypothesis. If the hypothesis cannot be testable or answered, they'll give you a prediction of what will most likely happen from the results of the hypothesis.


When using scientific method to solve a problem is a scientist most likely to do after forming a hypothesis?

After forming a hypothesis, a scientist is most likely to conduct experiments to test the hypothesis. This involves designing a controlled experiment to gather data and observations that will either support or refute the hypothesis. Following the experiments, the scientist analyzes the results to draw conclusions and may refine the hypothesis or develop further experiments based on the findings.


When using scientific method s to solve a problem is a scientist most likely to do after forming a hypotheSis?

After forming a hypothesis, a scientist is most likely to design and conduct experiments to test the hypothesis. This involves collecting data and making observations to determine whether the results support or refute the hypothesis. Based on the findings, the scientist may then analyze the data and draw conclusions, which could lead to further experimentation or the modification of the hypothesis.


Why was it that most scientific thinkers came from protestant countries?

This is because Protestants rejected indulgences and were mocked by how the church lied. They then had the idea of "what more was not true" these people became scientist who wanted the truth they preformed experiments and formed hypothesis to prove themselves correct.


When using scientific methods to solve a problem a scientists most likely to do after forming a hypothesis?

After forming a hypothesis, a scientist is most likely to design and conduct experiments to test the hypothesis. This involves systematically collecting data and making observations to determine whether the hypothesis is supported or refuted. The results of these experiments will help the scientist draw conclusions and may lead to further testing or the development of new hypotheses.


What is the most important part of the scientific method and why?

The steps in the scientific method are: 1. The scientist asks a question. 2. The scientist develops a hypothesis (an educated guess). 3. The scientist tests the hypothesis. 4. The scientist determines whether the hypothesis is correct. 5. The scientist records the steps, so that others can repeat them to see if they obtain the same results. In my opinion, the most important step is the first. We would not be able to make any new discoveries, without someone asking a question.


Why is collaboration of scientist is necessary for the process of scientific study?

The most important reason is if a single scientist forms a hypothesis and it is proved by his or her experiment it is still only a hypothesis. Other scientists need to repeat the experiment in every way conceivable to either prove or disprove the hypothesis. Only after the hypothesis has stood up to such scrutiny may it become a theory recognized by the scientific community. Another reason is that some research is simply too daunting and complex for a single person to complete.


Why are two most important factors that a scientist should consider when attempting to publish a paper in a specific journal?

Do you mean "what are"? If so, I would think hypothesis and conclusion...


What do scientist make to make a hypothesis or collect data during an experiment?

Most of the time they write down what they are going to do, what they think will happen judging on what they are using. Then they go from there


Can a hypothesis that has been unacceptable be of any value to scientist?

Yes. But usually a hypothesis (if, then, because statement) is changed overtime to establish a conclusion on the investigation. The point of the collection of the data is to show whether or not the hypothesis was supported, and if not needs to be corrected/modified. Certain parts may still be helpful/kept but in most cases it is changed


Who is Alfred Wegener most like?

Alfred Wegener is most like Albert Einstein.Both of their discoveries were rejected.Both of them had hypothesis no one really cared about - no offenseBoth of them became known as one of History's greatest scientist