The Roman emperors did not carry out any religious duties. At the beginning of the history of Rome, the king carried out important religious duties. These duties were then transferred to a priest called rex sacrorum (king of the sacred rites). This occurred either in the Late Monarchy or at the beginning of the Republic. With the introduction of the rex sacrorum the rulers of Rome did not have any religious functions and were entirely secular figures. Augustus, who was granted an unprecedented number of priesthoods, was an exception. Many emperors claimed that their rule had divine approval. Emperors could be deified after their death the and as such became honoured religiously. However, they did not carry out religious functions.
The majority of Roman emperors were of the patrician class although in the declining years of the empire some were of the equite class and others were simply ambitious generals.
List of Roman EmperorsThe dynasties and names in the list of Roman EmperorsList of all Roman Emperors including the usurpersList of famous Roman EmperorsList of Roman EmperorsAncient history, facts and interesting information about the Romans
All Roman Emperors were famous in their own way. There were 192 people who claimed the title Emperor of Rome from 27 BC when the Emperor Augustus took control of the Senate until 1185 AD. Some of the later such would now be called Byzantine Emperors, but a the time they called themselves Roman Emperors. Second answer. Generally speaking most historians separate the ancient Roman empire and the Byzantine empire. The Byzantine empire lasted until 1453 AD when the Ottoman Turks took over Constantinople.
Most Roman emperors lived in constant danger because of others who were trying to usurp their authority. Every emperor had plots of some sort directed against him and some even worked. Greed or ego trips were the motivations for the plots.
Most emperors ate the standard food of the day, but they always had the exotic foods on hand if they had a taste for them. Some emperors, such as Nero, liked to stretch his meals out, while others like Augustus hardly ate at all.
The Roman emperors did not carry out any religious duties. At the beginning of the history of Rome, the king carried out important religious duties. These duties were then transferred to a priest called rex sacrorum (king of the sacred rites). This occurred either in the Late Monarchy or at the beginning of the Republic. With the introduction of the rex sacrorum the rulers of Rome did not have any religious functions and were entirely secular figures. Augustus, who was granted an unprecedented number of priesthoods, was an exception. Many emperors claimed that their rule had divine approval. Emperors could be deified after their death the and as such became honoured religiously. However, they did not carry out religious functions.
Some Roman emperors did some weird things, but there is no evidence for this as far as I'm aware.
The majority of Roman emperors were of the patrician class although in the declining years of the empire some were of the equite class and others were simply ambitious generals.
Some were young (boys) others old men.
List of Roman EmperorsThe dynasties and names in the list of Roman EmperorsList of all Roman Emperors including the usurpersList of famous Roman EmperorsList of Roman EmperorsAncient history, facts and interesting information about the Romans
From Augustus (the first emperor) to the division of the Empire into Eastern and Western Empires in A.D. 395 there were 147 Roman Emperors, including 7 ruling the rebel Gallic empire and 2 leading the rebel British empire in defiance of central authority. After A.D.395 the Western Empire lasted until A.D476 under 23 emperors. The Eastern Empire lasted from A.D.395 to A.D.1453 under 94 emperors. From this you can see that the number of Roman emperors will be 147 if you count only the rulers of the United Roman Empire, or 9 fewer excluding rebel emperors, and many more if the Divided Empire totals of 23 and 94 more emperors are included.
All Roman Emperors were famous in their own way. There were 192 people who claimed the title Emperor of Rome from 27 BC when the Emperor Augustus took control of the Senate until 1185 AD. Some of the later such would now be called Byzantine Emperors, but a the time they called themselves Roman Emperors. Second answer. Generally speaking most historians separate the ancient Roman empire and the Byzantine empire. The Byzantine empire lasted until 1453 AD when the Ottoman Turks took over Constantinople.
Perhaps your question is not clear, but I am assuming that by "religious persecution" you refer to the early centuries of the Church. If so, the emperor was not a Christian and it is beyond cavil that Roman Emperors were still a strong government institution. Popes existed independently of the state. The papal line as popularly received traces through the early centuries - some were even exiled by the Roman Emperors. That these these two authoritative institutions existed at the same time is no difficulty as they were not in any way dependent on each other: the pope was the leader of a burgeoning religious movement that had no official political affiliations or legitimacy, the emperor was the pagan demigod and Roman head of state.
Most Roman emperors lived in constant danger because of others who were trying to usurp their authority. Every emperor had plots of some sort directed against him and some even worked. Greed or ego trips were the motivations for the plots.
Hinduism has many religious duties, while Buddhism has very few religious duties. some of these duties in Hinduism are Dharma (righteous living) Artha (material prosperity) Kāma (enjoyment) and Moksha (liberation) while Buddhism focuses on eternal peace and helping others.
Most emperors ate the standard food of the day, but they always had the exotic foods on hand if they had a taste for them. Some emperors, such as Nero, liked to stretch his meals out, while others like Augustus hardly ate at all.
In the Roman republic, the senate was in charge of the military. This was the reason that a Roman political hopeful had to have some military experience in order to be elected to the higher offices. One of the duties of a consul was to lead an army if necessary.In the Roman republic, the senate was in charge of the military. This was the reason that a Roman political hopeful had to have some military experience in order to be elected to the higher offices. One of the duties of a consul was to lead an army if necessary.In the Roman republic, the senate was in charge of the military. This was the reason that a Roman political hopeful had to have some military experience in order to be elected to the higher offices. One of the duties of a consul was to lead an army if necessary.In the Roman republic, the senate was in charge of the military. This was the reason that a Roman political hopeful had to have some military experience in order to be elected to the higher offices. One of the duties of a consul was to lead an army if necessary.In the Roman republic, the senate was in charge of the military. This was the reason that a Roman political hopeful had to have some military experience in order to be elected to the higher offices. One of the duties of a consul was to lead an army if necessary.In the Roman republic, the senate was in charge of the military. This was the reason that a Roman political hopeful had to have some military experience in order to be elected to the higher offices. One of the duties of a consul was to lead an army if necessary.In the Roman republic, the senate was in charge of the military. This was the reason that a Roman political hopeful had to have some military experience in order to be elected to the higher offices. One of the duties of a consul was to lead an army if necessary.In the Roman republic, the senate was in charge of the military. This was the reason that a Roman political hopeful had to have some military experience in order to be elected to the higher offices. One of the duties of a consul was to lead an army if necessary.In the Roman republic, the senate was in charge of the military. This was the reason that a Roman political hopeful had to have some military experience in order to be elected to the higher offices. One of the duties of a consul was to lead an army if necessary.