The strategies of the North was the Northern Strategy of Attrition, which led to its ultimate victory. By some it was called the Anaconda Plan. It involved blockading all the Southern ports and denying them the use of the Mississippi. This took a great deal of time to come to fruition, however, it was successful.
Look up the Anaconda Plan. it was the North's plan to cut off the South's economy. look it up broschi.
who are some of the people in civil war north against south?
The Anaconda Plan. The point of it was to cut off supplies from the south.
The South's strategy during the Civil War was to get Great Britian's support. >The South's strategy was to use the great military leaders and commanders they had in order to defeat the North. With the North having multiple advantages, the South used their strongest factor: military training.
Most of the manufacturing was in the North.
i really don't know but i would like some help please thank you
i really don't know but i would like some help please thank you
In some ways. It proved that the South could not win when it came to fight on northern land. If the South couldn't win in the North then they could not win the war.
They took it seriously
There were several commanders or generals for the North during the Civil War. Some of the top commanders included Ulysses S. Grant, George McClellan, Robert Anderson, and George Custer.
I could go on and on with this, but to keep it simple: -the north had more industry than the south -therefore, the north could produce more weapons and clothing -the north also had a vast railroad network-that allowed them to transport troops and supplies quicker -the north also had a good telegraph system-Lincolon could issue direct orders Those are some of the factors the north had going for them, so even if the south was very determined, they could not beat the north on industry, and that is probably why they lost the war.