answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The Nuremberg Laws were a set of antisemitic laws in Nazi Germany that stripped Jews of their rights and citizenship. The Nuremberg Trials were a series of military tribunals held after World War II to prosecute prominent Nazi officials for war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

2d ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What were the Nuremberg laws and what happened at the Nuremberg trials?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Law

What is the difference between Nuremberg trials and Nuremberg laws?

The Nuremberg trials were a series of military tribunals held after World War II to prosecute prominent Nazi leaders for war crimes, while the Nuremberg Laws were antisemitic legislation introduced in Nazi Germany in 1935 that defined Jews and implemented racial discrimination. The trials aimed to hold individuals accountable for their actions during the war, while the laws aimed to establish legal discrimination against Jews.


What was the difference between Nuremberg laws and Nuremberg trials?

The Nuremberg Laws were anti-Semitic laws passed by Nazi Germany in 1935, which deprived German Jews of their rights and citizenship. The Nuremberg Trials, held after World War II in 1945-1946, were a series of military tribunals in which major war criminals from Nazi Germany were prosecuted for crimes against humanity.


Was there controversy in the Nuremberg Trials?

Yes, there was controversy surrounding the Nuremberg Trials, particularly regarding the legality of retroactively applying new laws to prosecute war crimes, the fairness of the trials, and the scope of punishment. Some critics argued that the trials were victor's justice and undermined the defendants' right to a fair trial.


Who is franz schlegelberger at the Nuremberg trials?

Franz Schlegelberger was a German jurist who served as the Reich Ministry of Justice under the Nazi regime. He was indicted at the Nuremberg Trials for crimes against humanity for his role in implementing Nazi laws, including the Nuremberg Laws. Schlegelberger claimed he was unaware of the extent of the atrocities committed by the Nazis and was sentenced to 20 years in prison.


When did the Nuremberg trials end?

The Nuremberg trials ended on October 1, 1946.

Related questions

What happened at Nuremberg trials?

The Nuremberg trials were military tribunals conducted by the Allied Forces after the end of WW2. These trials were held for prominent members of Nazi Germany who were accused of war crimes.


What were the affects of the Nuremberg Laws?

The Nürnberg Laws (as distinct from the Nuremberg War Crimes Trials, a more or less unrelated set of trials that happened to be held about ten years later in the same city where the laws were introduced) were a set of anti-semitic laws passed in Nazi Germany in 1935. You can see the related links for a detailed explanation.


Why were the Nuremberg trails significant?

The Nuremberg trials were significant because Nuremberg was the city in Germany where the Nuremberg Laws were created, which deprived Jews of German citizenship. The trials were held in Nuremberg because it was almost like a punishment for the Nazis.


Who was persecuted after World War 2?

Between 1945 and 1946, German officials involved in the holocaust and other war crimes were brought before an international tribunal in the Nuremberg Trials. The Soviet union had wanted these trials to take place in Berlin, but Nuremberg was chosen as the site for the trials for specific reasons. They chose Nuremberg as the spot for the trials because 6 years before Hitler created the Nuremberg Laws. The Nuremberg Laws were a collection of 2,000 laws that said what Jews could and could not do. By, Husky Pratt Special thanks to Wikipedia.com for helping me spell Nuremberg right.


What is the difference between Nuremberg trials and Nuremberg laws?

The Nuremberg trials were a series of military tribunals held after World War II to prosecute prominent Nazi leaders for war crimes, while the Nuremberg Laws were antisemitic legislation introduced in Nazi Germany in 1935 that defined Jews and implemented racial discrimination. The trials aimed to hold individuals accountable for their actions during the war, while the laws aimed to establish legal discrimination against Jews.


Why did the Nuremberg Trials take place in Nuremberg?

It was rather a ironic and symbolic place to hold the trials. From 1927-1938, the Nazis held major rallies there. It was there where the Nazis passed the Nuremberg Laws, outlawing the Jews doing really anything.


What year were the Nuremberg laws introduced?

The Nuremburg laws were passed in 1935 in Germany.


What was the difference between Nuremberg laws and Nuremberg trials?

The Nuremberg Laws were anti-Semitic laws passed by Nazi Germany in 1935, which deprived German Jews of their rights and citizenship. The Nuremberg Trials, held after World War II in 1945-1946, were a series of military tribunals in which major war criminals from Nazi Germany were prosecuted for crimes against humanity.


How did the allies deal with the issues of the war crimes in Europe?

After the surrender of Germany in 1945 Allies arranged Nuremberg trials to try war criminals. These trials were held in Nuremberg, Germany.


What country was the Nuremberg trials held in?

Nuremberg is in Germany


Was there controversy in the Nuremberg Trials?

Yes, there was controversy surrounding the Nuremberg Trials, particularly regarding the legality of retroactively applying new laws to prosecute war crimes, the fairness of the trials, and the scope of punishment. Some critics argued that the trials were victor's justice and undermined the defendants' right to a fair trial.


Who is franz schlegelberger at the Nuremberg trials?

Franz Schlegelberger was a German jurist who served as the Reich Ministry of Justice under the Nazi regime. He was indicted at the Nuremberg Trials for crimes against humanity for his role in implementing Nazi laws, including the Nuremberg Laws. Schlegelberger claimed he was unaware of the extent of the atrocities committed by the Nazis and was sentenced to 20 years in prison.