0
What were the checks and balances on the representative assembly's power in the roman republic?
Wiki User
∙ 8y ago
There was no "who" who acted as a check on the power of the republican leaders. The check on their powers was incorporated into the office that they held. For example, an aedile could only judge minor disputes dealing with something like weights and measures while something more serious such as murder was judged by a praetor. Even a consul had to comply with the law and with custom as he could be prosecuted for crimes once he left office.
There was no "who" who acted as a check on the power of the republican leaders. The check on their powers was incorporated into the office that they held. For example, an aedile could only judge minor disputes dealing with something like weights and measures while something more serious such as murder was judged by a praetor. Even a consul had to comply with the law and with custom as he could be prosecuted for crimes once he left office.
There was no "who" who acted as a check on the power of the republican leaders. The check on their powers was incorporated into the office that they held. For example, an aedile could only judge minor disputes dealing with something like weights and measures while something more serious such as murder was judged by a praetor. Even a consul had to comply with the law and with custom as he could be prosecuted for crimes once he left office.
There was no "who" who acted as a check on the power of the republican leaders. The check on their powers was incorporated into the office that they held. For example, an aedile could only judge minor disputes dealing with something like weights and measures while something more serious such as murder was judged by a praetor. Even a consul had to comply with the law and with custom as he could be prosecuted for crimes once he left office.
There was no "who" who acted as a check on the power of the republican leaders. The check on their powers was incorporated into the office that they held. For example, an aedile could only judge minor disputes dealing with something like weights and measures while something more serious such as murder was judged by a praetor. Even a consul had to comply with the law and with custom as he could be prosecuted for crimes once he left office.
There was no "who" who acted as a check on the power of the republican leaders. The check on their powers was incorporated into the office that they held. For example, an aedile could only judge minor disputes dealing with something like weights and measures while something more serious such as murder was judged by a praetor. Even a consul had to comply with the law and with custom as he could be prosecuted for crimes once he left office.
There was no "who" who acted as a check on the power of the republican leaders. The check on their powers was incorporated into the office that they held. For example, an aedile could only judge minor disputes dealing with something like weights and measures while something more serious such as murder was judged by a praetor. Even a consul had to comply with the law and with custom as he could be prosecuted for crimes once he left office.
There was no "who" who acted as a check on the power of the republican leaders. The check on their powers was incorporated into the office that they held. For example, an aedile could only judge minor disputes dealing with something like weights and measures while something more serious such as murder was judged by a praetor. Even a consul had to comply with the law and with custom as he could be prosecuted for crimes once he left office.
There was no "who" who acted as a check on the power of the republican leaders. The check on their powers was incorporated into the office that they held. For example, an aedile could only judge minor disputes dealing with something like weights and measures while something more serious such as murder was judged by a praetor. Even a consul had to comply with the law and with custom as he could be prosecuted for crimes once he left office.
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Wiki User
∙ 8y agoThe Roman Republic did not have a representative assembly. It practiced direct democracy, which means that instead of electing representatives to vote on bills, the people voted on bills in popular assemblies. These assemblies were the Assembly of the Soldiers, the Assembly of the Tribes (an assembly of the districts) and the Plebeian Council.
Wiki User
∙ 11y agoThere was no "who" who acted as a check on the power of the republican leaders. The check on their powers was incorporated into the office that they held. For example, an aedile could only judge minor disputes dealing with something like weights and measures while something more serious such as murder was judged by a praetor. Even a consul had to comply with the law and with custom as he could be prosecuted for crimes once he left office.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Did the constitution create a democracy or a republic?
No, the Framers created a republic, not a democracy.
What stops one branch of government form being to powerfull?
checks and balances and separation of powers
Which philosopher originally thought of checks and balances?
Barron de Montesquieu originally thought of the idea for checks and balances. :)
What stops one branch from from being to powerful?
The US government has a system of checks and balances.
What were three checks and balances of the roman republican government?
Only the government of the Roman Republic (509-27 B.C.) had checks and balances. The government of the monarchy (753-509 B.C.) and of rule by emperors (27 B.C.-476 B.C.) did not. During the Roma republic officer of state of the same rank could veto each other and higher officers could veto the lower officers. This was to avoid abuse of power.
Governmental power in the Roman Republic was divided among many groups as a form of checks and balances Which of these provided a structure for governing in the early Roman Republic?
assemblys and senate
What are the various ways the principle of checks and balances operated in the government of the roman republic?
the roman republic was the first to think of checks and balances.
When was checks and balances first put in test?
"Checks and balances" was first put to test in 1748 the Roman Republic.
Why did the Roman Republic create a system of checks and balances?
Checks and balances prevented one group from gaining more power over the other.
Why did the roman republic created a system of checks of balances?
Checks and balances prevented one group from gaining more power over the other.
Why the roman republic create a system of checks and balances?
Checks and balances prevented one group from gaining more power over the other.
How does a representative government BEST serve the purpose of constitutional government?
A representative government should provide checks and balances to the branches of government.
How was the government of the Roman Republic an example of checks and balances?
Well the governement back in the Roman ages
What is the system by which each branch of government could delay or stop an action taken by one of the other branches?
checks and balancesIt is a system of checks and balances.
Use checks and balances in a sentences?
Example sentence for the noun phrase 'checks and balances':The government uses checks and balances to separate the responsibilities of departments.
What form of government was your country founded as in 1787?
America was founded as a Constitutional Republic incorporating representative democracy through elected congressmen in Washington D.C. America's government includes a system of checks and balances between the Legislative, Executive, and Judicial branches.
Controls given to one branch of government to limit the power of another branch are known as what?
Checks and balances!Add me on myspace AmandaAmor!
