The Jewish historian, Josephus, would have been familiar with the Temple veil before the destruction of the Temple in 70 CE. He say (Wars of the Jews, Book 5), "It was a Babylonian curtain, embroidered with blue, and fine linen, and scarlet, and purple, and of a contexture that was truly wonderful. Nor was this mixture of colors without its mystical interpretation, but was a kind of image of the universe; for by the scarlet there seemed to be enigmatically signified fire, by the fine flax the earth, by the blue the air, and by the purple the sea; two of them having their colors the foundation of this resemblance; but the fine flax and the purple have their own origin for that foundation, the earth producing the one, and the sea the other. This curtain had also embroidered upon it all that was mystical in the heavens, excepting that of the [twelve] signs, representing living creatures."
There is no mention of the damage supposed to have occurred to the veil when Jesus was crucified.
They are specified in Exodus 26: white, blue, purple and red.
Every year.
A:The Jewish historian, Josephus, who had been a priest at the Temple and would have been familiar with the Temple veil before the destruction of the Temple in 70 CE, describes the curtain and its images and colours in considerable detail (Wars of the Jews, Book 5), but makes no mention of any damage to it, or any repairs.
no, because there were no cameras then
Neither Jewish girls nor adult females wear a veil. Jewish women only cover their hair after they are married.
The Temple of Herod.
No, i don't think shirley temple is Jewish
Scholars say that Luke's Gospel was substantially copied from Mark's Gospel, so the author discovered this from Mark We can not say where the author of Mark obtained this information, especially as the temple veil was not visible from outside the temple and certainly not from the crucifixion site. This raises the question of whether the veil, or curtain, was really torn. The Jewish historian, Josephus, was also a priest and would have been familiar with the Temple veil before the destruction of the Temple in 70 CE. His description of it makes no mention of the damage supposed to have occurred to the veil when Jesus was crucified.Josephus says (Wars of the Jews, Book 5), "It was a Babylonian curtain, embroidered with blue, and fine linen, and scarlet, and purple, and of a contexture that was truly wonderful. Nor was this mixture of colors without its mystical interpretation, but was a kind of image of the universe; for by the scarlet there seemed to be enigmatically signified fire, by the fine flax the earth, by the blue the air, and by the purple the sea; two of them having their colors the foundation of this resemblance; but the fine flax and the purple have their own origin for that foundation, the earth producing the one, and the sea the other. This curtain had also embroidered upon it all that was mystical in the heavens, excepting that of the [twelve] signs, representing living creatures."
Antiochus made those additions to the Jewish temple
The Jewish temple in Jerusalem.
There was a think veil or curtain in the holy temple place it was twelve feet by twelve feet thick and not easy totear but it toar asunder in two aftwer christ was crucified.
Jerusalem was the only place in the world that had a Jewish Temple at that time.
LUKE