answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

It was a process, rather than an event. It was the result of a struggle between patricians and plebeians which lasted 200 years. It has been termed the Conflict of the Orders. The patrician aristocracy had monopolised power through what has been called the closing of the patriciate: it closed its ranks and excluded other elites. The conflict started with a rebellion by the poor plebeians when the patrician-controlled state refused to meet their demand to address the abuse of debt defaulters by creditors. The poor formed the plebeian movement to fight for the economic grievances of the poor. The rich plebeians, who were educated, became the leaders of the movement and used it to gain access to power. Eventually, despite bitter patrician resistance, they succeeded through many agitations and gained access to the offices of state, the senate and some priesthoods.

The rich plebeians were co-opted into a patrician-plebeian oligarchy and shared power. The patrician-plebeian distinction with respect to rich plebeians, become politically irrelevant. However, a distinction of rank was maintained. The rich plebeians were given equite (cavalryman status) which was the lower order of the aristocracy. The patricians remained the higher order.

It is important to be aware that this process involved only the rich plebeians. The poor plebeians just remained poor and their economic grievances were not addressed properly. When the rich plebeians obtained power-sharing and noble status, they turned their back on the poor. Later on, in the Late Republic, the economic plight of the poor (which was becoming worse) re-emerged as a political hot potato and the plebeian movement (that is, the movement of the poor plebeians) became militant again.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What were the events that led to equality in the roman republic government between plebeians and patricians?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

How would you describe the Conflict of the Orders?

It was a political struggle between the Plebeians (commoners) and Patricians (aristocrats) in the Roman Republic 494 to 287 BCE, with the Plebeians pursuing political equality with the Patricians.


What are the two groups who struggled for power in the early republic?

Patricians and Plebeians


What roles did the plebeians and patricians have in the roman republic?

Crops


Why were so many plebeians dissatisfied with Romes government in the early years of the republic?

because the patricians ruled over the plebeians and they made unfair laws and the plebeians had to work with no pay and no breaks.


Who were the pleabeins in the early Roman Republic?

In the Early Roman Republic the plebeians were the commoners; that is, all non-patricians. The patricians were the aristocracy.


How were patricians and plebeians diffreint?

Patricians and plebeians were two social classes. At the beginning of the city the patricians were the wealthy and the plebeians were the poor. However over time the plebeians gained civil rights and wealth and by the late republic they were considered the nobility along with the patricians.Patricians and plebeians were two social classes. At the beginning of the city the patricians were the wealthy and the plebeians were the poor. However over time the plebeians gained civil rights and wealth and by the late republic they were considered the nobility along with the patricians.Patricians and plebeians were two social classes. At the beginning of the city the patricians were the wealthy and the plebeians were the poor. However over time the plebeians gained civil rights and wealth and by the late republic they were considered the nobility along with the patricians.Patricians and plebeians were two social classes. At the beginning of the city the patricians were the wealthy and the plebeians were the poor. However over time the plebeians gained civil rights and wealth and by the late republic they were considered the nobility along with the patricians.Patricians and plebeians were two social classes. At the beginning of the city the patricians were the wealthy and the plebeians were the poor. However over time the plebeians gained civil rights and wealth and by the late republic they were considered the nobility along with the patricians.Patricians and plebeians were two social classes. At the beginning of the city the patricians were the wealthy and the plebeians were the poor. However over time the plebeians gained civil rights and wealth and by the late republic they were considered the nobility along with the patricians.Patricians and plebeians were two social classes. At the beginning of the city the patricians were the wealthy and the plebeians were the poor. However over time the plebeians gained civil rights and wealth and by the late republic they were considered the nobility along with the patricians.Patricians and plebeians were two social classes. At the beginning of the city the patricians were the wealthy and the plebeians were the poor. However over time the plebeians gained civil rights and wealth and by the late republic they were considered the nobility along with the patricians.Patricians and plebeians were two social classes. At the beginning of the city the patricians were the wealthy and the plebeians were the poor. However over time the plebeians gained civil rights and wealth and by the late republic they were considered the nobility along with the patricians.


Who were the Nobility in the roman times?

It depends on what time you mean. In the beginning the nobility were the patricians, but by the mid republic the plebeians also were considered the nobility. This was because both the patricians and the plebeians were descendants of the original founders of the city, whereas the immigrants to the city were not.It depends on what time you mean. In the beginning the nobility were the patricians, but by the mid republic the plebeians also were considered the nobility. This was because both the patricians and the plebeians were descendants of the original founders of the city, whereas the immigrants to the city were not.It depends on what time you mean. In the beginning the nobility were the patricians, but by the mid republic the plebeians also were considered the nobility. This was because both the patricians and the plebeians were descendants of the original founders of the city, whereas the immigrants to the city were not.It depends on what time you mean. In the beginning the nobility were the patricians, but by the mid republic the plebeians also were considered the nobility. This was because both the patricians and the plebeians were descendants of the original founders of the city, whereas the immigrants to the city were not.It depends on what time you mean. In the beginning the nobility were the patricians, but by the mid republic the plebeians also were considered the nobility. This was because both the patricians and the plebeians were descendants of the original founders of the city, whereas the immigrants to the city were not.It depends on what time you mean. In the beginning the nobility were the patricians, but by the mid republic the plebeians also were considered the nobility. This was because both the patricians and the plebeians were descendants of the original founders of the city, whereas the immigrants to the city were not.It depends on what time you mean. In the beginning the nobility were the patricians, but by the mid republic the plebeians also were considered the nobility. This was because both the patricians and the plebeians were descendants of the original founders of the city, whereas the immigrants to the city were not.It depends on what time you mean. In the beginning the nobility were the patricians, but by the mid republic the plebeians also were considered the nobility. This was because both the patricians and the plebeians were descendants of the original founders of the city, whereas the immigrants to the city were not.It depends on what time you mean. In the beginning the nobility were the patricians, but by the mid republic the plebeians also were considered the nobility. This was because both the patricians and the plebeians were descendants of the original founders of the city, whereas the immigrants to the city were not.


What is an upper class roman called?

In the early days, the upper class people were called the patricians. However when the plebeians gained their upward mobility they also became upper class. So in the later republic both patricians and plebeians were referred to as the aristocrats or the nobility.


How main classes did the roman republic have?

Patricians 2 Plebeians 5


What is the differences between the patricians and the plebeians in the roman republic?

The patricians were heads of aristocratic families and the plebians were the common people.


What is the difference between the patricians and the plebeians in the Roman republic?

The patricians were heads of aristocratic families and the plebians were the common people.


What is the relationship between the Plebeians and the patricians?

Plebians and Patricians are similar because they were both Latin and worked with at least one type of republic;Plebeians worked with Assembly and Patricians worked with Senate