I think that they just wanted a better country.
Basically Hamilton wanted investors to have confidence in the economy. He wanted to bolster national credit, while maintaining some debt to keep investors tied to the American bank. Also he centralized the economy by creating a National Bank. (sorry for the ambiguity, I didn't get much of this stuff when I read Founding Brothers or when we went over it in class) Jeffersonians hated this because they believed it was unconstitutional (didn't explicitly state that Hamilton could create a National Bank in the Constitution). Madison didn't like assumption because his state, VA, didn't have much debt to begin with. Hamilton argued that the Constitution did not explicitly state that he could not do that (principle of elastic clause, loose interpretation of the Constitution rather than a Jeffersonian strict interpretation).
Alexander Hamilton did not believe that the Constitution created a strong enough central government, but felt that it was better than the alternative of keeping the Articles of Confederation. There is no evidence that he supported the Constitution for any other reason besides the fact that he felt that it was a better system of government.
Motives can be good or bad, open or ulterior, simple or complex, strong or weak, sane or insane.
his motives were to get silk and become rich
Georgia was founded for two reasons. First, the English feared that Spain was about to expand its Florida colony northward. An English colony south of Carolina would keep the Spanish bottled up in Florida. Second, a group of wealthy Englishmen led by James Oglethorpe wanted a colony where there would be protection for English debtors. Under English laws, the government could imprison debtors until the paid what the owed.
The motives of the framers of the constitution was to create a country whereby peace, justice, equality and freedom could be preserved and enjoyed. The other motive was for the constitution to be binding and protective for the future generation.
Yes.
Charles Beard's thesis, that the Founding Fathers were motivated by economic self-interest when writing the U.S. Constitution, has been widely debated. While some historians agree with aspects of Beard's argument, many others believe that it oversimplifies the complexity of the founders' motives and the context of the time. Overall, Beard's thesis has had a significant influence on the field of history, but it is not universally accepted as being completely accurate.
Both men wanted to find and own new lands. They wanted to have more power than what they already had.
The main motives for formulating the 1931 Ethiopian Constitution were to modernize the country's legal system, establish a framework for governance that would balance traditional Ethiopian practices with Western elements, and to strengthen Emperor Haile Selassie's central authority. The constitution aimed to codify the laws of the empire and provide a legal basis for the government's actions.
Hilgard categorized motives into survival motives, social motives, and ego-integrated motives.
Loss of respect by their peers. Name-calling. Questioning their father's motives, among others.
The three types of motives are biological motives, social motives, and personal motives. Biological motives are driven by physiological needs such as hunger and thirst. Social motives are influenced by interpersonal interactions and relationships. Personal motives are driven by individual desires and goals.
Physiological motives include- Hunger Aggression Sex Social motives
Motives are internal factors that drive a person to behave in a particular way. Some common types of motives include biological motives (such as hunger and thirst), social motives (such as the need for affiliation and achievement), and emotional motives (such as the desire for love and acceptance). These motives can interact and influence behavior in various ways.
Basically Hamilton wanted investors to have confidence in the economy. He wanted to bolster national credit, while maintaining some debt to keep investors tied to the American bank. Also he centralized the economy by creating a National Bank. (sorry for the ambiguity, I didn't get much of this stuff when I read Founding Brothers or when we went over it in class) Jeffersonians hated this because they believed it was unconstitutional (didn't explicitly state that Hamilton could create a National Bank in the Constitution). Madison didn't like assumption because his state, VA, didn't have much debt to begin with. Hamilton argued that the Constitution did not explicitly state that he could not do that (principle of elastic clause, loose interpretation of the Constitution rather than a Jeffersonian strict interpretation).
Alexander Hamilton did not believe that the Constitution created a strong enough central government, but felt that it was better than the alternative of keeping the Articles of Confederation. There is no evidence that he supported the Constitution for any other reason besides the fact that he felt that it was a better system of government.