answersLogoWhite

0

Theire main argument was that the Constitution binds the states much like England binded the states. In their eyes, why go back to be bound if they just fought a war to be free?

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What were the mains arguments used by the anti-federalists?

Theire main argument was that the Constitution binds the states much like England binded the states. In their eyes, why go back to be bound if they just fought a war to be free?


What most accurately describes anti-federalists?

Anti-Federalists were those who opposed ratification of the Constitution of the United States created by the delegates at the Constitutional Convention. The Anti-Federalists feared centralized power, one of the arguments used in declaring independence from Great Britain. They also believed that republican institutions, like the government created by the Constitution, could only survive in small countries. Many Anti-Federalists agreed to drop their opposition to the new government under the Constitution, only when it was agreed that a Bill of Rights would be added by the first Congress.


What were the main arguments used by anti-federalist?

Theire main argument was that the Constitution binds the states much like England binded the states. In their eyes, why go back to be bound if they just fought a war to be free?


Main arguments used by the anti federalist?

Theire main argument was that the Constitution binds the states much like England binded the states. In their eyes, why go back to be bound if they just fought a war to be free?


What was the Anti-Federalists' main concern about the Constitution?

The anti-federalists believed that the Constitution would take away critical powers from the states, and warned that without a Bill of Rights the government might also take away the rights of the people that were just won in the Revolution.


Which viewpoint was common among Anti-Federalists?

The anti-federalists were proponents of strong state governments and a weak federal (national) government. The anti-federalists believed that a strong national government would lead to tyranny. They believed that the state governments would protect the rights of citizens better than a national government. Because there are fewer residents in each state, there is a more homogeneous culture. Think of the difference between New York and Wyoming. New York is very liberal whereas Wyoming is more conservative. The anti-federalists favored a system that was used in the Articles of Confederation, which placed more power in the state governments before the constitution was written.


List the argument of the anti-federalists used to against ratifying the Constitution?

The Anti-Federalists opposed a lot of the ideas of a strong or "big" central government. Their main concerns included the fact that the constitution before the bill of rights contained no language guaranteeing individual rights, they feared that the position of the presidency could eventually evolve into a position more like a king or a dictator, and they didn't like the fact that the rights of the states were being undermined.


What is used to safe guard computer system?

Anti-virus software and firewalls are the main safeguards used.


How did the federalist respond to concerns from the antifederalists?

Answer on E2020:The Federalists created a system of checks and balances in the government. This system limited the power of the various branches of government so that one branch could not take all the power and become tyrannical. Each branch was also able to 'check' the powers of the other branches, so that no branch could act alone.


What was the main reason anti federalists distrusted a standing army?

Anti-Federalists distrusted a standing army primarily because they believed it posed a threat to individual liberties and state sovereignty. They feared that a permanent military force could be used by the federal government to suppress dissent and enforce tyranny, undermining the rights of citizens. Additionally, they argued that local militias were more appropriate for defense, as they would be under the control of state governments rather than a centralized authority. This concern reflected their broader apprehension about concentrated power in the federal government.


Describe the arguments used to justify and oppose secession?

The arguments used to justify and oppose secession


Define anti federalist?

An Anti-Federalist is someone who opposed the ratification of the United States Constitution during the late 1700s. They believed that the Constitution would create an even more powerful federal government that would threaten the rights and liberties of the people. Anti-Federalists wanted to keep the government decentralized and argued that a strong federal government would lead to tyranny and the loss of state-level autonomy. They also feared that the Constitution would lead to an imbalance of power between the states and the federal government. Their primary arguments against the Constitution were that it lacked a Bill of Rights to protect citizens from the government, and that it created a federal government with too much power. They argued that the government should be limited to specific and enumerated powers and that the states should retain their sovereignty. Anti-Federalists were also worried about the judicial branch, as they feared that it would be too powerful and could be used to oppress citizens.