The Anti-Federalists opposed a lot of the ideas of a strong or "big" central government. Their main concerns included the fact that the constitution before the Bill of Rights contained no language guaranteeing individual rights, they feared that the position of the presidency could eventually evolve into a position more like a king or a dictator, and they didn't like the fact that the rights of the states were being undermined.
they didn't get to practice the Bill of Rights
they didn't get to practice the Bill of Rights
Antifederalists
it had no bill of rights
they were against ratifying the constitution
Opponents of ratifying the Constitution were known as the Anti-Federalists, which included figures like Patrick Henry and George Mason. Their major argument against ratification centered on the fear that the new federal government would be too powerful, undermining states' rights and individual liberties. They also criticized the lack of a Bill of Rights, believing it was essential to protect citizens' freedoms from potential government overreach.
The major argument was the absence of a bill of rights in the Constitution
They would not have enough state votes to pass the constitution if slavery was outlawed by it. The south would have voted against it.
it did not guarantee basic rights
it did not guarantee basic rights
I believe one argument he made was that there are no provisions for cessation in the Constitution. One problem with the argument is that according to the Constitution any powers not given to the federal government are reserved to the states.
many members of congress and the state government were against the new constitution, because it took power from the government and gave it to the people.