0
What were the two parts of the decision given by the supreme court in the dread Scott case?
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
Dred Scott (circa 1799 - September 17, 1858) was a slave in the United Stateswho unsuccessfully sued for his freedom and that of his wife and their two daughters in the Dred Scott v. Sandford case of 1857, popularly known as the "Dred Scott Decision." The case was based on the fact that although he and his wife Harriet Scott were slaves, they had lived with his master, Dr. John Emerson, in states and territories where slavery was illegal according to both state laws and the Northwest Ordinance of 1787, including Illinois andMinnesota (which was then part of the Wisconsin Territory). The United States Supreme Court decided 7-2 against Scott, finding that neither he nor any other person of African ancestry could claim citizenship in the United States, and therefore Scott could not bring suit in federal court under diversity of citizenshiprules. Moreover, Scott's temporary residence outside Missouri did not bring about his emancipation under the Missouri Compromise, which the court ruled unconstitutional as it would improperly deprive Scott's owner of his legal property.
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What African American sued for his freedom in 1846?
Dred Scott sued his master for his freedom on the grounds that he had been living on free soil for several years. The Supreme Court decided that he was not a citizen and had no legal right to sue.
What was the main issue in the dread Scott case?
It was meant to be a verdict over whether a slave who had been taken on to free soil could claim his freedom after returning to slave country. It ended up generating a storm of protest, because the High Court declared that the Constitution protected a man's property, and that slaves were property - simple as that. Did this mean that there could be no free soil - after all the hard work put into nearly forty years of compromises?
How was the thirteenth Amendment different from the Emancipation Proclamation?
The Proclamation only freed slaves in territory then in rebellion. Slavery remained legal in territory recaptured from the Confederacy prior to the Proclamation, and in states that never left the Union, such as Maryland and Kentucky. The 13th Amendment applies to all the US, thus eliminating the impact of court decisions such as the Dread Scott Decision. In addition to abolishing slavery in the entire country it explicitly conferred citizenship rights on all former slaves, something the Proclamation did not address.
How did the brown vs the board of education begin?
Brown vs Board of Education is one of our nation's landmark court cases that was heard by the Supreme Court and the judgement handed down in 1954 that stated that separate public school systems (or educational facilities) for black students and white students is in fact not equal (unequal). I believe that you are asking more about the origin of the case and so I will try to shed some light on that as well. As far as I can understand things, the Brown vs Board of Education decision was larger a decision that came about from the intense years that took place prior to the case which were riddled with a firm belief of the idea of segregation. Initially the case of Plessy vs Ferguson in 1896 was grounds for a lot of the belief that segregation was indeed justifiable through its finding/decision that as long as the two races had separate but ultimately equal facilities to divide them, there was no violation of the Fourteenth Amendment through the practice of segregation (14th Amendment simply stated that no person/citizen could be unfairly treated in any legal aspect, basically it was set in place to give both black and white people the same rights---also know as the Equal Protection Clause). Now if you truly look deeper into the entire issue of segregation and equal rights among the races, there is also the matter of the Dread Scott decision which even before the equal rights initiatives took place the Scott decision boldly declared that black people residing in the nation were not citizens and could never become citizens, and ultimately that meant that they were not afforded the same rights or benefits of citizenship as others could. In that time period one has to realize that our nation was in the process of not only adjusting to the notion of slavery being over but also people were still learning how to even live among one another with a still very divided set of laws, rights, and beliefs.I would go further into details about all of the elements that play a part in the years prior to the Brown vs Board decision, but if I did so it would probably take a lot more time and space up that ultimately might not give you a better understanding but just seem like a bunch of extra info not relevant to the question at hand. If I can help further please let me know.Thanks and hope I helped,onenonlycasper aka austin j.h.
How did the Missouri compromiseand compromise of 1850 and dread Scott lead to the secession of the south?
They both raised the temperature of the slavery debate. The first included a toughening-up of the Fugitive Slave Act, which caused an emotive reaction in the North. The second declared that slavery was protected by the constitution, which seemed to end any hopes of letting new states vote on whether to be slave or free.
Who was the slave who sued for his freedom in the Supreme Court was?
Dred Scott
In the dread Scott case what was the Supreme Court ruling?
The judge's ruling in the Dred Scott case stated that slaves and freed slaves were not US citizens. Thus they had no power to sue in court and the federal government could not control slavery.
What effect did the dread Scott decision have on slavery in the territories?
The verdict by the Supreme Court appeared to mean that all property, including slave property, was sacred, and that no state could declare itself to be free soil.
What Supreme Court case stated that Congress did not have the right to ban slavery in states and that blacks were not citizens?
The Dread Scott case was the Supreme Court case the stated that Congress did not have the right to ban slavery in states and that blacks were not citizens.
Why were many southerners pleased by the courts decision in the dread Scott case?
Many Southerners were pleased by the Dred Scott case decision because it upheld the rights of slave owners by ruling that slaves were property and not citizens, which meant they could be taken into any territory in the United States. This decision supported the expansion of slavery and protected the economic interests of slave owners in the South.
What was the second occasion when S.C.O.T.U.S declared an act of Congress unconstitutional?
After the Dread Scott case the Supreme Court declared the Missouri Compromise of 1820 unconstitutional
Who helped dread Scott?
Prior to and during the Dred Scott case, only the lawyer who represented him gave him any help. The Supreme Court ruled that no African Americans, whether free or enslaved, had citizenship in the United States, a decision that enraged abolitionists and empowered slave holders. After the decision, Scott's owner married an abolitionist, who persuaded her to return Scott and his family to his original owners. By this time, his original owners were also anti-slavery, and he and his family were freed.
What effects did the Dread Scott Decision by the Supreme Court have on slavery in the territories as well as on salves themselves?
It declared slavery to be lawful in every state of the Union. Its effect was to heighten the dispute betwen the two sides, and to help bring on the Civil War - which eventually freed all the slaves.
What was the effect of the dread Scott case?
The Dred Scott case, decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1857, ruled that African Americans, whether free or enslaved, were not considered citizens and therefore could not sue in federal court. This decision intensified tensions between the North and South over the issue of slavery and further fueled the growing divide that eventually led to the Civil War.
What African American sued for his freedom in 1846?
Dred Scott sued his master for his freedom on the grounds that he had been living on free soil for several years. The Supreme Court decided that he was not a citizen and had no legal right to sue.
How did the Dread Scott Decision divide the north from the south?
inside of an egg, only 7 crocodiles are eating
What was the supreme court's decision in Scott v sanford?
An unexpected ruling about the Constitution and its view of slavery. The court reckoned that when the Founding Fathers declared that a man's property was sacred, they would have included slaves within their definition of property. If so, then slavery must be legal in every state of the Union. This judgment drove the two sides further apart than ever.
