There weren't two sides - it was a starkly one-sided judgment.
If you mean what were its two conclusions, it said first that a man's property was sacred and slaves were property, and second that a black man was not the sort of person who ought to be suing a white man. Together these statements infuriated the North and delighted the South, raising the temperature of the debate even further.
If you mean what were the arguments for and against freeing Scott, he had been living on free soil, where his freedom would have been granted automatically, but he had not claimed it till he was back in slave country. This left his position unclear, and that is why the case reached the Supreme Court.
It drove the two sides further apart, and brought war closer.
Dred Scott (1795 - September 17, 1858), was an African-American slave in the United States who unsuccessfully sued for his freedom and that of his wife and their two daughters in the Dred Scott v. Sandford case of 1857, popularly known as "the Dred Scott Decision
They were infuriated at the verdict which declared slavery legal in every state of the Union, and it drove the two sides further apart than ever.
By declaring that the Constitution protected slavery throughout the USA, the Supreme Court drove the two sides further apart, and helped to bring war closer.
It heightened the division between the two sides - it delighted the South and greatly offended Northern abolitionists. It raised the temperature of the debate, and brought civil war closer.
It drove the two sides further apart, and brought war closer.
It drove the two sides further apart, and brought war closer.
Controversial and divisive.
Dred Scott (1795 - September 17, 1858), was an African-American slave in the United States who unsuccessfully sued for his freedom and that of his wife and their two daughters in the Dred Scott v. Sandford case of 1857, popularly known as "the Dred Scott Decision
They were infuriated at the verdict which declared slavery legal in every state of the Union, and it drove the two sides further apart than ever.
By declaring that the Constitution protected slavery throughout the USA, the Supreme Court drove the two sides further apart, and helped to bring war closer.
It heightened the division between the two sides - it delighted the South and greatly offended Northern abolitionists. It raised the temperature of the debate, and brought civil war closer.
The two main implications of the Dred Scott decision were that African Americans, whether free or enslaved, were not considered American citizens and therefore did not have the right to sue in federal court, and that Congress could not prohibit slavery in the territories, effectively invalidating the Missouri Compromise.
Dred Scott was fighting for his freedom. The Dred Scott case was a landmark Supreme Court decision that ruled African Americans were not considered citizens and therefore did not have the right to sue in federal court. The decision further fueled the tensions over the issue of slavery leading up to the Civil War.
It infuriated the Abolitionists, delighted the South, and heightened the tension between the two sides, bringing the war a step closer.
It infuriated the Abolitionists, delighted the South, and heightened the tension between the two sides, bringing the war a step closer.
It infuriated the Abolitionists, delighted the South, and heightened the tension between the two sides, bringing the war a step closer.