-Disobedience
-Pretending they don't understand their owner/master/overseer
-Damaging things on purpose
-Armed rebellion, in which they usualy harmed or even killed white people
-Coded messages
Slaves resisted the authority of their owners by performing acts of sabotage, feigning illness or incompetence to disrupt work, and escaping or running away from plantations.
Under the 3/5ths Compromise, each enslaved person was counted as three fifths of a free person for population reasons. This was especially true when it came to determining taxation and legislative representation for slave holding states.
The Three-Fifths Compromise was a compromise reached during the Constitutional Convention of 1787 in the United States, where enslaved individuals were counted as three-fifths of a person for the purposes of taxation and representation in Congress. This compromise allowed slaveholding states to have more political power while dehumanizing and excluding enslaved individuals.
The anti-slavery reform was a movement in the 19th century that sought to abolish slavery and the slave trade. It was led by individuals and organizations that believed in the immorality and injustice of slavery, and worked towards its eradication through political, social, and legal means. The movement gained momentum globally and ultimately led to the outlawing of slavery in many countries.
A person might become a slave through capture in war, inheritance of slave status, or being born to enslaved parents.
Three ways they reacted was: 1.they broke tools 2. they acted sick 3.they listened to everything they were told so them and their family were treated nice and given easier jobs. Allison Nicole Ricker
Blacks faced many problems, couldn't vote or receive information, and had a threat about being captured and sold into slavery
Frederick Douglass escaped from slavery and became a prominent abolitionist. He wrote three books about his experiences as an enslaved person.
three-fifth
Three fifths were slaves
I mean...none directly. They were slaves. THAT was the main problem. The 3/5ths compromise was an attempt by the south to 'have cake and eat it too'. They wanted slaves to be non-persons when it suited their interests, but to count as persons when it suited their interests (such as representation in congress). But if you were a slave, you didn't give a you-know-what about any of that because you were being enslaved. And your children were enslaved. I suppose one could make an argument that the 3/5ths compromise increased the power of the pro-slavery bloc in congress, thereby extending the time that slavery remained legal.
When counting people to determine representation, a slave was counted as three fifths of a person.
Even if we take the earliest possible date for Jewish slavery that the Bible suggests, the Jews were enslaved in Egypt a good three hundred years after the 1750 B.C. completion date of the pyramids. That is, of course, if they were ever slaves in Egypt at all.
The three fifths compromise was the plan that proposed that every five enslaved persons would count as three free persons.
Harriet Tubman, Fredrick Douglas, Ula Young
Rome, after three wars, and sold the people into slavery to finalise the contest.
for ever five elslaved people they counted three of them it was called a three- fifth