0
That depends on whose wrong hands.
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Who has nuclear weapons now and how many are there?
I don't believe anyone is supposed to have any kind of nuclear weapons due to the arms limitations treaties of the Cold War. I could be wrong, I'm not a big military official.
How is knowlogy good and how is knowlogy bad?
.... Could you clarify as to what "knowlogy" is? If you mean knowledge, you could say that medecine can help to cure people but in the wrong hands - the poorly trained, those with bad motives - it can damage or even kill. Similarly, physics can help to build nuclear reactors for peace or war , for electricity or nuclear weapons.
Is using nuclear weapons wrong?
Yes, it not only damages the environment but it also kills wildlife and can affect human life and can destroy it.
What is Iran doing to block world pease?
Probably making nuclear weapons and threatening people(this is what I think). Oh and you spelled peace wrong. :)
Why are nuclear weapons bad?
They can destroy from a big city to half the world, depending how powerful it is.
What is wrong with Niall Horan's hands?
Nothing is wrong with his hands
Are people scared of nukes?
The cold war has come and gone, but the weapons that caused the cold war still remain. In the 1960s , every person of age living in the world was aware of the threat that Nuclear Weapons posed. The world was in such a tense state that Nuclear drills were as common as Tornado drills. This was with only the United States and Russia having Nukes. Today, there are quite a few countries with nuclear weapons. It might surprise some people that India and Pakistan both have Nukes. Of course North Korea has nuclear weapons now as well as Isreal. It looks like the world has to prepare for Nuclear Iran in the future as well. Most people don't know the stakes anymore. For instance, 1000 Nuclear weapons can end life on earth. Both the US and Russia have enough weapons to do this. 1000 Nukes can create a global Nuclear Winter and life would wither away and the earth's atmosphere would change. To keep it short.... We created a weapon that can end our time on the greatest planet on earth. Its not really about war. Its about the wrong people getting their hands on Nuclear arsenals.... Mistakes, computer errors.. etc. We've come closer to Nuclear war than many people know. Watch the video above and see how close we've come to all out destruction.
What wrong with nuclear energy?
people
Why did the Soviets make nuclear weapons?
The U.S developed nuclear weapons to scare the Japanese and end world war 2 for the Americans ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Wrong! Actually the U.S. developed nuclear weapons in WW2 in an arms race with the supposed Nazi Germany project to do the same. Unknown to us, the German project soon stalled and concentrated on reactors not bombs. When Germany surrendered in spring 1945 the U.S. project continued as it was so close to finishing. In August the only 2 nuclear bombs used in war were dropped on Japan, prompting their surrender and ending the war. They were developed to defend against a possible German threat but got used against Japan to end the war. After the war, development slowed but was prompted by fears of the expansion of Soviet Communism. Development accelerated again after the USSR's 1949 test of their first nuclear bomb, causing an extended arms race.
Should third world countries be permitted to produce nuclear weapons?
There is no right or wrong answer to this question. On one hand, a nuclear weapon allows a smaller nation the ability to fight back against a larger one. For instance, if Poland was a nuclear power in 1939, how might it have changed the history of WWII if Berlin had been destroyed by a nuclear weapon? So nuclear weapons give nations a great weapon that could cause other nations to think twice before attacking. Also having nuclear weapons could be a great sense of pride and of progress. If your nation has the ability to process and maintain a nuclear arsenal, then your nation can do almost anything it sets itself to do. There is also a false belief that two nations with nuclear weapons have never gone to war. Many people forget that both India and Pakistan have gone to war while also being nuclear armed. Additionally, India and China have also fought. On the other hand, 3rd world nations are prone to unstable governments, corruption, lax security, and possibly even a bad command and control mechanism for when and how to use nuclear weapons. One of the great concerns right now is Pakistan's nuclear arsenal. Pakistan is a nation rife with corruption and unknown allegiences of many in its government. If the government were to collapse and the military found itself in a civil war, where would the nuclear weapons go? Who would control them? You can imagine the outcome if a member of Lashkar-e-Tayyba or al-Qa'ida were to get their hands on a nuclear device. Additionally, it could cause an arms race and cause a domino affect of sorts. If one nation in a region gets nuclear weapons, the others will fear for their safety and start building their own and then neighbors of those countries will do the same. With heightened tensions, it would become much more likely for one nation to accidentally or intentionally detonate a nuclear weapon on their neighbor and ignite a regional nuclear war. So again, there is no right answer. Not all third world nations are on the verge of collapse and could easily maintain a nuclear arsenal. I suppose it comes down to motive and intent.
What are the ratings and certificates for In the Wrong Hands - 2002?
In the Wrong Hands - 2002 is rated/received certificates of: USA:PG-13
When PHI is in the wrong hands it can impact?
PHI in the wrong hands can impact all of the following except: Military leave
