answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The Free Syrian Army (FSA) has a number of hurdles to overcome in order to have more international support. The most prominent three are:

1) Lack of Coherent Future-Vision and Unity: The Free Syrian Army is a motley crew of various different militias that all foresee different futures for Syria. These militias operate separately with minimal communication between them. Some want a more secular democracy, some want a theocratic Islamist Dictatorship (along the same lines, but slightly different from Islamic State), and numerous others want something in the middle, like an Islamist republic (a la Erdoganist Turkey) or a democracy without countermajoritarian protections (such as mob rule). Contrary to the Kurds, the Assad Regime, or Islamic State, the FSA fighters are not unified militarily or ideologically. Many Western countries do not want to support any groups other than those who believe in secular democracy, but cannot identify which ones those are.

2) Lack of Victories: Simply, the FSA has had very few military victories. It does not make sense to support a group that cannot make successful territorial advances. The investment is less likely to pan out positively.

3) Lack of Historic Alliances: The Assad Regime has historic alliances with Russia for naval bases and with Iran for political issues. The Free Syrian Army has no similar alliances nor has it made any pledges or incentives for foreign powers to support it.

As a result, in order for more countries to take the FSA seriously, they need to unite behind a coherent future-vision, begin to actually emerge victorious from a few battles, and assert that they will respect or support the kinds of alliances that the Assad Regime had promised to support.

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What will it take for more countries to start supplying arms to the Free Syrian Army?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

When was Syrian Army created?

Syrian Army was created on 1946-08-10.


What is Free Syrian Army's motto?

The motto of Fatah is 'The winds cannot shake the mountain Ya Jabal Mayhezak Reeh'.


How do you put supplying in a sentence?

One of the main difficulties in war is supplying an army while it is on the march.


Who are the main leaders of the struggle for democracy in syria?

The SYRIAN ARMY and the


Who was the leader of the Syrian army in the Six-Day War?

warren hasting


Why have Libya Egypt Jordan and the United Arab Emirates ceased all attempts to supply arms to the Syrian Opposition?

These countries no longer see the Free Syrian Army as being viable and are increasingly turning their attention to a resurgent Assad and a quasi-independent Kurdistan as a counterweight to Islamic State.


What region has been fought over by Israel and Syria?

1. In 1948 Syria joined other countries in a military effort to prevent the Israeli conquest of the country of Palestine. After the alliance was defeated the country of Israel was declared. Before 1948 there was nothing called Israel. 2. In 1967 The Israeli army initiated a massive attack on Syrian, Palestinian and Egyptian lands adjacent to the founded Israeli nation cutting off pieces of these countries and adding it to Israel including the Syrian 'Jolan' Heights. 3. The last military encounter was in 1973. The Syrian army along with the Egyptian army launched an attack in an effort to regain the lands that where occupied by Israel in 1967. parts of the occupied Syrian land was returned including 'Qunaitirah' in the 'Jolan' Heights and international forces were deployed in the area.


If the Free Syrian Army started recruiting foreigners the same way that the French Foreign Legion does would it have the manpower that it would need to win the Syrian Civil War?

That could work, from strictly a manpower perspective, but most foreign recruits would be untrained and poorly equipped. Additionally, each foreign recruit undermines the legitimacy of the Free Syrian Army as a Syrian Army. As a result, it is not a likely policy to be embraced.


Is the Syrian regime democratic?

NO. All of the various governments in Syria at the moment are non-democratic. The Assad Regime was an authoritarian republic, Islamic State is a theocratic dictatorship, the Syrian Kurds are a military junta, and the Free Syrian Army is also a military junta.


Is Lebanon and Syria still in war now?

Lebanon and Syria have not been in direct conflict since the Syrian army ended the Syrian Occupation of Lebanon in April 2005. There have been some border skirmishes, especially because some of the Syrian Civil War spills over into Lebanon, but there is no declared war between the Syrian Regime or any of the other Syrian Civil War parties and Lebanon.


Why does the Free Syrian Army need training from the West and what do they hope to gain from it?

Not all militaries are equally disciplined, equally able to effectively coordinate between units, equally able to assess opponent strategies, or are equally able to find effective methods to prioritize and achieve objectives. Western countries have really perfected modern fighting techniques at a level far superior to simply point and shoot, but have complex battle tactics and strategies. As a result, the NATO armed forces have been training the Afghan Army and the Iraqi Army in order to make those armies function along much more modern and efficient lines. The Free Syrian Army would want this kind of operations training from Western countries.


What will happen when the Free Syrian Army ousts Assad tries his crimes against humanity destroys ISIS and forces the Russians Chinese and Iranians to fully withdraw?

Even assuming that this inordinately unlikely scenario comes to pass, there is no way to know how the Free Syrian Army would establish a political system. There is no coherent political philosophy coming from the Free Syrian Army as to what kind of government they want. Some members of the army argue for a Secular Eepublic and others (who are more powerful) argue for an authoritarian Islamist theocracy and there are many views in between.