In most situations any words that are not profane are more appropriate than profanity. yes but what words
The English language includes approximately a million words. There are words for every occasion. You are probably thinking about words that express anger. Someone has insulted you, perhaps, so what do you say? You, sir, are a horrible person. You are reprehensible, vile, monstrous, foul, and evil. Your existence pollutes the universe. You are a stench in the nostrils of God. I loathe and detest you with every fiber of my being. You are irrational, depraved, and nauseating. You have poor taste in clothing.
Saying "crap" is generally more accepted as opposed to s***.
The appropriate guide words for "nuisance" would be "nugget" and "oak".
you car were i by would i go
How about kilometers instead of miles
It is preferable ...
Substances would work
Sometimes humour is based on the unexpected, confounding the viewer's expectations. Profanity is no different, humour can arise from it being used in a context where you would not expect to hear it.
No. Revert means to return something to a previous state. Reply or respond would be appropriate instead of 'get back'.
The answer is no. Profanity would be the noun form of profane.
There are a number of reasons why you would teach the word thick instead of broad. You may be talking about the layers of Earth for example and broad wouldn't be appropriate.
If your password was a profanity or inappropriate it would not be allowed
There are lots of vulgar words. In English, words that are profane are based on things that can morally disgust someone, such as excrement (the s-word), eternal damnation (the h-word), sexual organs (there's a few of them), the posterior (the a-word), racism (the n-word, as well as many others), and the all-encompassing f-word.