Renewable forms of energy are sources that can be replenished quickly and easily. These include plants, the sun, wind, water, etc. Non-renewable forms of energy aren't easily replenished. For example coal is formed over millions of years. Even though there might be more deposits of coal unfound which we can mine to replenish our stock, coal is non-renewable.
hydroelectric power , fuel cells, photovoltaics Apex
photovoltaics, wind energy, geothermal heat pumps
There are many forms of renewable energy (solar, wind, water, hydro, tidal and wave, geothermal, ocean thermal, biomass, biofuel and hydrogen).
Geothermal energy is considered a renewable energy source. Which means that, unlike the fossil fuels we rely on for energy, we can continue to use geothermal without having to be concerned that we will run out of energy. In terms of electricity generation, a geothermal power plant will emit only about 1% of the carbon dioxide that a fossil fuel powered plant would produce to generate the same amount of electricity. Although this may not be as good as solar or wind powered forms of electricity generation, geothermal does have the advantage of being able to produce a steady supply of electricity 24/7, something that most renewable energy sources can't.
Without our daily fix of solar energy, the Earth would soon approach the temperature of space - not a pleasant prospect. You have to only consider how much it cools down on a single winter night to have your answer. If your question concerns technical systems that usefully convert solar energy to other forms; solar water heating, photo-voltaic energy, etc; then we are at the dawn of using this energy source more usefully. In doing so, we displace other less effective means of doing the same job. Coal fired energy plants would be an example, as are petroleum powered vehicles.
No but if you were to put it out in the sun it would collect energy.
listen in class and you would know..
i think it would be the atlantic
Burning coal, and nuclear reactors using Pu-239
because it repeats over and over again.
because it repeats over and over again.
there would be more of what their using and it will never run out Or yo Momma (:
Renewable energy is a noteworthy goal and hopefully it will be cost effective in the future. To stand against renewable energy just because it is renewable would not be a worthy endeavor.
no source of energy is actual renewable. Once energy is used entropy keeps it from be reused, this is why we don't have perpetual motion machines. If you want two nor renewable energy source from the political world it would be any resource that once used does not return, and watter. Hydroelectric is considered non renewable (don't know why and I have multiple bachelor degrees in science) fossil fuels (Coal, natural gas, gasoline, diesel, kerosene etc.) wind and solar are both considered renewable.
If it could be done it would be similar to renewable. (it is what the Sun does and Sunlight is looked at as renewable energy).
Coal is a NON-renewable energy as when burnt, the Coal combusts, emitting carbon dioxide, among other harmful products. A renewable energy would be wind or tidal or solar energy for example.
Oil, the fossil fuel, is a non-renewable resource on human time scales. Vegetable oil is a renewable resource. An inexhaustible resource would be sunlight and a renewable resource would be wind energy and solar energy.
Non-renewable energy is any energy resource that is 'finite'. Examples are coal, oil, gas. renewable energy would be wave, wind, & solar.
there would be more of what their using and it will never run out Or yo Momma (:
As long as the water flows, energy can be generated. It would be renewable.