It's really difficult to select one from the list of choices that you submitted
along with your question. We can only surmise that the speed of a 'following'
particle might be the same or less than that of a leading particle.
It depends on the wavelength of the photon. Energy of each photon is hc/λ, where h = Planck's constant = 6.626x1034 Js, c = speed of light = 3x108 m/s, and λ = wavelength of the photon
Yes, due to the energy of photons/electromagnetic particles being determined by the equations below: E= hv=hc(1/v)= hc/wavelength. Where E= energy, v= frequency in Hz, h= Planck's constant, c= speed of light Electrons have a very short wavelength, and a very high frequency, thus they have much more energy than a beam of light.
Wavelength, Frequency, or Photon Energy
The energy of this photon is 3,7351.10e-19 joules.
In a light microscope the resolution of the image it can project is limited by the distance each photon travels in its wavelength. Beneath this minimum distance, the "noise" of the photon's movement along its path overwhelms any resolution the light source may otherwise provide.
You need to know the photon's frequency or wavelength. If you know the wavelength, divide the speed of light by the photon's wavelength to find the frequency. Once you have the photon's frequency, multiply that by Planck's Konstant. The product is the photon's energy.
It depends on the wavelength of the photon. Energy of each photon is hc/λ, where h = Planck's constant = 6.626x1034 Js, c = speed of light = 3x108 m/s, and λ = wavelength of the photon
The energy of a photon is inversely propotional to its wavelength. The wavelength of a blue photon is less than that of a red photon. That makes the blue photon more energetic. Or how about this? The energy of a photon is directly proportional to its frequency. The frequency of a blue photon is greater than that of a red photon. That makes the blue photon more energetic. The wavelength of a photon is inversely proportional to its frequency. The the longer the wavelength, the lower the frequency. The shorter the wavelength, the higher the frequency.
photon
The energy per photon is directly proportional to the frequency; the frequency is inversely proportional to the wavelength (since frequency x wavelength = speed of light, which is constant); thus, the energy per photon is inversely proportional to the wavelength.
a photon
Yes, due to the energy of photons/electromagnetic particles being determined by the equations below: E= hv=hc(1/v)= hc/wavelength. Where E= energy, v= frequency in Hz, h= Planck's constant, c= speed of light Electrons have a very short wavelength, and a very high frequency, thus they have much more energy than a beam of light.
Wavelength, Frequency, or Photon Energy
Electrons are the lighter particles of an atom. If you are referring to the phenomena of light in electromagnetic radiation the particles are called photons. They are not part of an atom as such but can be emitted or absorbed by atoms under certain circumstances.
Light is a beam that is shot out of a light source or explosion of gas and photon particles give of that beam which does have a mass but todays technology is unable to measure it.
No one, photons are particles of light.
for a photon energy= Planks Constant * frequency and frequency= speed of light/wavelength so E= hc/(wavelength) h= 6.63E-34 J/s c= 3E8 m/s Plug n' Chug