answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

During the republic, they could voice their concerns to their tribune and perhaps pressure him to get the decision changed or modified. During the principate, there was little they could to except live with it.

During the republic, they could voice their concerns to their tribune and perhaps pressure him to get the decision changed or modified. During the principate, there was little they could to except live with it.

During the republic, they could voice their concerns to their tribune and perhaps pressure him to get the decision changed or modified. During the principate, there was little they could to except live with it.

During the republic, they could voice their concerns to their tribune and perhaps pressure him to get the decision changed or modified. During the principate, there was little they could to except live with it.

During the republic, they could voice their concerns to their tribune and perhaps pressure him to get the decision changed or modified. During the principate, there was little they could to except live with it.

During the republic, they could voice their concerns to their tribune and perhaps pressure him to get the decision changed or modified. During the principate, there was little they could to except live with it.

During the republic, they could voice their concerns to their tribune and perhaps pressure him to get the decision changed or modified. During the principate, there was little they could to except live with it.

During the republic, they could voice their concerns to their tribune and perhaps pressure him to get the decision changed or modified. During the principate, there was little they could to except live with it.

During the republic, they could voice their concerns to their tribune and perhaps pressure him to get the decision changed or modified. During the principate, there was little they could to except live with it.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

During the republic, they could voice their concerns to their tribune and perhaps pressure him to get the decision changed or modified. During the principate, there was little they could to except live with it.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What would citizens of rome do if they thought a decision made by rome was unfair?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about General History

Why did thomas Paine think that citizens should MAKE laws?

He thought that the people should make the laws because they are the ones that know which laws would help them and the community.


What did president Roosevelt have to do with Pearl Harbor?

President Franklin D. Roosevelt, he was the man who made the decision to not protect the pearl harbor because he thought the Japanese would never hit the pearl harbor, he thought they would choose a more challenged part of the United States. But the Japanese thought ahead and hit a more easier target.


Why do you believe the Quartering Act was either fair or unfair to the American colonies?

it is unfair because the colonists couldn't speak up for themselves because they were scared that if they did the British solders would try to harm them


How does natural rights relate to the Declaration of Independence?

Well, the Revolutionary War had many causes like the Boston Tea Party, The Stamp Act, and many more. The colonists mostly thought that these taxes were unfair to them so they thought they had rights to say something. For example, the British soldiers came to live with the colonists eating up all of their food, drinking their drinks etc. How would you feel?


Why were the treaties with American Indians not always fair?

Their language was unfair because they(the American Indians) didn't understand what they were signing. Also, after the treaty of Paris, the American Indians thought that they would let them keep their lands, but the British colonists still took their lands even though they helped the Treaty of Paris

Related questions

Do all players have to agree on a gimme putt?

yes they do otherwise one player may favour another which would make the decision unfair


Why is it important for citizens to be informed?

It is important to be informed because a decision could be made that would change your life.


What do you think caused some delegates to the constitutional convention of 1787 to be unwilling to let the people elect the president directly?

Most citizens would not have access to information to help them make an imformed decision.


What does it mean to make a good desicion?

It means you thought carefully about the possible consequences of your decision and made the decision that would have the most positive effect.


Should John F. Kennedy be on mt Rushmore?

A matter of opinion. It is a decision the US citizens would have to make. Some would agree some would not.


Did hamilton and Jefferson agree that is was fair for speculators to make a profit?

No, Thomas Jefferson thought that it would be unfair to the original bondholders who had sold their bonds to the speculators.


A sentence that uses the word enrollment?

Sally had to pay an enrollment fee to the registration department at the university. She felt it was unfair to pay money just to enroll in college. She thought it should be free. More students would enroll into college if they did not have this unfair fee.


Is unfair one word or two?

Unfair is one word. An example sentence would be "cheating in the answerthon is unfair on honest contributors".


Why were the delegates against the idea of allowing the general public to vote for president?

Most citizens would not have access to information to help them make an imformed decision.


Why is it important for U.S. citizens to be informed?

It is important to be informed because a decision could be made that would change your life.


Why was the decision to assign jurisdiction over controversies between citizens of different states to the Supreme Court significant?

The decision to assign jurisdiction to the Supreme Court for cases where the parties are in different states is something that was decided in the Judiciary Act of 1789. It is thought that this is the only way to guarantee each party that the judging would be impartial, though it does require extensive research of state laws for Federal court staff.


Why were some delegates against the idea of allowing the general public vote for president?

Most citizens would not have access to information to help them make an imformed decision.