When the Southern states succeeded, it meant the North were no longer collecting their cotton export tariffs.
The North and the West for the most part were anti-slavery.
Slave holders were in favor of the Fugitive Slave Law as it required that slaves that escaped to the North would have to be returned to their owners. In the North the anti slavery abolitionists were against the law. They were anti slavery to begin with and wanted slaves who escaped to the North to be considered freed slaves.
Yes. The South was pro-slavery, while the North was anti-slavery. Hope this helps!
Because mane
No they thought slavery was bad that's how the civil war started but in the 1800s there was slavery in the north and south. The Union was anti-slavery.
There were northern states which were slave states prior to the war. To say either was "anti-slavery" kinda dumbs down the issue.
Conductors (on the underground railroad) They were: freed slaves Quakers Abolitionists Anti-slavery activists
The issue that the North and South fought over was called the Wilmot Proviso. It was basically a law of slavery: the North and South were fighting over slavery. The North were anti-slavery and the South were pro-slavery
he fled to the north so he could be free and lead an anti-slavery boycot
The Union (North) (Anti-Slavery) and the Confederates (South)(Pro-Slavery).
No- not all Southerners were pro-slavery, just like not all Northerners were anti-slavery.
there are tons of other websites that will give you that answer but the main reason was because of slavery issues between the north and the south. the north was anti slavery and the south was pro slavery.