England would be speaking in french and there would be a different story on the bayeux tapesrty!
Harold Godwinson and Harald Hardrada, fought in the Stamford bridge battle. Then Harold then had to walk all the way south of the country, until he got to the battle of hastings place. ( i don't no where it was fought, i think it was in hastings ) Harold had lost most of his well trained men and was really tired from walking all that way so he was tired for the battle of hastings. So supposedly, that's 2 of the reasons he lost.
There were two other battles in 1066 against the Vikings- the Battle of Fulford and The Battle of Stanford Bridge. This is one of the reasons we lost the Battle of Hastings- thousands of men were lost in these battles
He traveled south to battle Harold Hardradi, and he lost
He didn't and Hastings played no part in the battle. The Saxon King Harold arranged for his army to gather at the "hoar (grey and old) apple tree", a familiar landmark that the men would have known, sited on a ridge which would give the English a defensive high ground position. This was at the place now called Battle, not at Hastings. This ridge at Battle was a very strong position with marshes and ditches in front and around it, commanding the main route from Hastings to London - the route that William had to take. Given sufficient troops, Harold could have held the position indefinitely and William would have lost.
William the conqueror (who was the Norman leader and who won) and Harold Godwin (who was the English king and lost)
Harold Godwinson and Harald Hardrada, fought in the Stamford bridge battle. Then Harold then had to walk all the way south of the country, until he got to the battle of hastings place. ( i don't no where it was fought, i think it was in hastings ) Harold had lost most of his well trained men and was really tired from walking all that way so he was tired for the battle of hastings. So supposedly, that's 2 of the reasons he lost.
Because he lost the Battle of Hastings.
The Saxons/English lost to the Normans/French well.
There were two other battles in 1066 against the Vikings- the Battle of Fulford and The Battle of Stanford Bridge. This is one of the reasons we lost the Battle of Hastings- thousands of men were lost in these battles
He traveled south to battle Harold Hardradi, and he lost
Battle of Lost River happened on 1872-11-29.
Harald lost the battle due to Williams tactics of moving his troops out of their battle positions. Williams idea very soonly decreased his army.
He didn't and Hastings played no part in the battle. The Saxon King Harold arranged for his army to gather at the "hoar (grey and old) apple tree", a familiar landmark that the men would have known, sited on a ridge which would give the English a defensive high ground position. This was at the place now called Battle, not at Hastings. This ridge at Battle was a very strong position with marshes and ditches in front and around it, commanding the main route from Hastings to London - the route that William had to take. Given sufficient troops, Harold could have held the position indefinitely and William would have lost.
it is an event that happened to measure its importance depends upon your point of view.
William the conqueror (who was the Norman leader and who won) and Harold Godwin (who was the English king and lost)
Duke William the Second of Normandy defeated King Harold the Second of Wessex at the Battle of Hastings. The battle occurred in October 1066 and Harold was killed.
William won battle of hastings because he had more reliable weapons