The answer to your question calls for speculation, not fact. You can get a hundred views on the subject, but none of them would be correct because the event you are asking about did not happen.
The answer to your question calls for speculation, not fact. You can get a hundred views on the subject, but none of them would be correct because the event you are asking about did not happen.
The answer to your question calls for speculation, not fact. You can get a hundred views on the subject, but none of them would be correct because the event you are asking about did not happen.
The answer to your question calls for speculation, not fact. You can get a hundred views on the subject, but none of them would be correct because the event you are asking about did not happen.
The answer to your question calls for speculation, not fact. You can get a hundred views on the subject, but none of them would be correct because the event you are asking about did not happen.
The answer to your question calls for speculation, not fact. You can get a hundred views on the subject, but none of them would be correct because the event you are asking about did not happen.
The answer to your question calls for speculation, not fact. You can get a hundred views on the subject, but none of them would be correct because the event you are asking about did not happen.
The answer to your question calls for speculation, not fact. You can get a hundred views on the subject, but none of them would be correct because the event you are asking about did not happen.
The answer to your question calls for speculation, not fact. You can get a hundred views on the subject, but none of them would be correct because the event you are asking about did not happen.
The answer to your question calls for speculation, not fact. You can get a hundred views on the subject, but none of them would be correct because the event you are asking about did not happen.
More buildings would be destroyed by fires started by lightning
In the 14th century, witches were either burned at the stake, or if not completely sure that they had magic, the people would drown them. If they floated they knew of the innocence, but if not, the magic they never had would die with them
Libya, Israel (or Palestine, as many people in Egypt would insist on calling it), and Sudan
Egypt's geography greatly affects the culture. IT does so in many ways. If Egypt did not have all of the natural barriers, like the Nile, the Red Sea, The mediterranean, and the Sahara Desert, Egypt would have been attacked many times. Having these natural barriers created a sort of shield on Egypt's culture. It does so because these barriers gave Egypt the time to flourish and adapt a culture. Also with the marshes of the Delta. These marshes are home to many many papyrus plants, which is turned into paper. Without these plants, they would have nothing to write on! These are a couple of reasons egypts geographical location effects it's culture
There would be catastrophic flooding and water damage from the two disasters. A tsunami can itself be considered a kind of flood.
So Egypt would not have a greater chance of being conquered.
The city of Rome was never conquered. What was conquered was most of the lands of the Western Roman Empire. What happened in 455 was that Rome was sacked by the Vandals. They did not stay in order not to have to face troops which would have been gathered around Italy to deal with them.
It never would have happened, simple as that
The Romans were resilient and would have made a comeback.
The Romans, in effect, conquered Egypt in 31 BC after the battle of Actium. However, since Octavian did not enter Egypt and take possession of the country until 30 BC, either of the two dates would be correct.The Romans, in effect, conquered Egypt in 31 BC after the battle of Actium. However, since Octavian did not enter Egypt and take possession of the country until 30 BC, either of the two dates would be correct.The Romans, in effect, conquered Egypt in 31 BC after the battle of Actium. However, since Octavian did not enter Egypt and take possession of the country until 30 BC, either of the two dates would be correct.The Romans, in effect, conquered Egypt in 31 BC after the battle of Actium. However, since Octavian did not enter Egypt and take possession of the country until 30 BC, either of the two dates would be correct.The Romans, in effect, conquered Egypt in 31 BC after the battle of Actium. However, since Octavian did not enter Egypt and take possession of the country until 30 BC, either of the two dates would be correct.The Romans, in effect, conquered Egypt in 31 BC after the battle of Actium. However, since Octavian did not enter Egypt and take possession of the country until 30 BC, either of the two dates would be correct.The Romans, in effect, conquered Egypt in 31 BC after the battle of Actium. However, since Octavian did not enter Egypt and take possession of the country until 30 BC, either of the two dates would be correct.The Romans, in effect, conquered Egypt in 31 BC after the battle of Actium. However, since Octavian did not enter Egypt and take possession of the country until 30 BC, either of the two dates would be correct.The Romans, in effect, conquered Egypt in 31 BC after the battle of Actium. However, since Octavian did not enter Egypt and take possession of the country until 30 BC, either of the two dates would be correct.
You would get the Death penalty.
if it never happened, lots of people would be alive,America would not have hatred on Iraq and there would be no history on the Persian Gulf War
Egypt would probably have been destroyed earlier.
People would have been driven out of egypt. The answer was just a prediction.
People would have been driven out of egypt. The answer was just a prediction.
People would have been driven out of egypt. The answer was just a prediction.
You could use it like this: Egypt would not be able to annex Libya. Sudan has never attempted to annex Egypt.