Want this question answered?
The parol evidence rule has nothing to do with the parole system. The parol evidence rule has to do with contract law. It prevents a person who is a party to a written contract from arguing that external evidence contradicts the words of the contract.
Unless otherwise prohibited
Any evidence that is part of court case is valid throughout the entire trial. There is no expiration on evidence even if it is a report from a level 2 security officer.
There is no standard. If there is an expiry condition of the governing documents, that detail is written within them. Otherwise, if your state law dictates expiry, and there is no mention of expiry in your governing documents, your state 'association ownership' law takes effect. Your board of directors are most able to answer your specific question.
Generally, written testimony is unavailing if the other side does not have a chance to cross-examine the witness. It doesn't hurt to try, though, if that's the best you can do. A notarized statement might be very helpful to establish damages if the other side defaults (does not show up) and you can be awarded whatever damages you can prove.
Hugh Seidman has written: 'Collecting evidence'
You would need to provide evidence that the court can review that highlights and counters the alleged bias. You need to show the reasons why the court should conclude that the lawyer is biased. For example, the evidence might be in written form such as official documents, testimony of witnesses or evaluations and affidavits made by professionals.
Ivory Harmon has written: 'Testimony and documents in the cases' -- subject(s): Trials, litigation, Horse-drawn omnibuses, Insolvency, Bankruptcy
Roark M. Reed has written: 'Expert testimony' -- subject(s): Expert Evidence, Medical jurisprudence
You must be much more specific in your question. There are entire textbooks written on this subject.
Testimony refers to a formal written or spoken statement given in a court of law by a witness under oath. It serves as evidence in legal proceedings and helps establish the truth of a matter.
"Contaminate" is not an adjective that applies to verbally given testimony or written statements. It is applied to physical evidence of the type usually found at a crime scene or seized later in support of the investigation.
Paul M. Deutsch has written: 'Rehabilitation testimony' -- subject(s): Expert Evidence, Law and legislation, Medical jurisprudence, Rehabilitation
The parole evidence rule applies when there is a (signed) written document that would be contradicted by oral testimony. In other words, "if it ain't on the papers, it ain't part of the deal."
Yes. Written documents do not take the place of 'live' testimony and do not fit the Constitutional requirement that the accused be faced with his accusers.
A letter of testimony is a written document provided by someone to support a person's character, abilities, skills, or achievements. It is often used in legal proceedings, job applications, or academic settings to provide evidence of an individual's credibility or qualifications.
Gerald H. Vandenberg has written: 'Court Testimony in Mental Health' -- subject(s): Expert Evidence, Forensic psychology, Mental health laws