Want this question answered?
A dumb scientist. The only person you should tell if you found somthing worth sharing is the news reporter!
A dumb scientist. The only person you should tell if you found somthing worth sharing is the news reporter!
A dumb scientist. The only person you should tell if you found somthing worth sharing is the news reporter!
If a scientist were to be dishonest, would people really believe his findings?
Some fossils have been discovered by accident by farmers, ranchers, excavators, or others not involved in the scientific community. Paleontologists are the chief scientist who do most of the proper digging and interpretation of fossil findings.
a scientist exploring evidence from other fields of science to support findings
Its important because other scientist can know what they're working on and if its accurate, or if they can improve their findings.
Because of the basic rule of the scientific process. A scientist's findings must be repeatable by others in similar conditions to dispel any belief that results were not due to the scientist's error, fancy, motives, etc.
Scientists first create an hypothesis. They develop methods to prove their hypothesis. In order for other scientists to replicate the findings and prove or disprove another scientist's outcome, the original scientist MUST describe the methods used and the findings.
The scientist regularly confounds his students with his findings, but they enjoy his lectures.
The scientists should be careful because when they are releasing their findings if anybody cheat them and publish the finding before the scientist then it will be a great shock for the scientist and we could not know the real person who have found it.
They need to double check and double check. Maybe some thing has come up and so they double check.