The Roman Empire was never divided into two parts. Western Roman Empire and Eastern Roman Empire are terms which have been coined by historians. The Romans had only one term: Roman Empire. The emperor Diocletian subdivided the Roman Empire into four (not two) main administrative units, the praetorian prefectures, in 293. They were Oriens (The East, north-eastern Greece and eastern Bulgaria, the Roman territories in Western Asia and Egypt, which comprised Egypt and the coast of eastern Libya), Illyricum (the Roman territories in the Balkan Peninsula except eastern Bulgaria and north-eastern Greece), Italia et Africa (Rhaetia; that is, Switzerland and part of Austria and Bavaria, Italy, the coast of central and western Libya, Tunisia, and the coast of Algeria) and Galliae, (Galiae; that is, France, Belgium, Holland south of the River Rhine and Germany west of the Rhine; Hispaniae; that is, Spain, Portugal and northern Morocco; and Britannia; that is, England and Wales).
The emperor Diocletian created the tetrarchy (rule by four) which had two senior emperors (Augusti) and two junior ones (Caesars). Each of the four emperors was in charge of one of the praetorian prefectures and was given an imperial seat. Therefore, there were four "capitals": Nicomedia (modern Izmit in north-western Turkey) for the praetorian prefecture of Oriens, Sirmium (modern Sremska Mitrovica, near Belgrade, in Serbia) for the praetorian prefecture of Illyricum, Mediolanum (modern Milan in Italy) for the praetorian prefecture of Italia et Africa and Augusta Trevorum (modern Triers in Germany) for the praetorian prefecture of Galliae. Rome ceased to be the capital of the Roman Empire. Diocletian and Maximian, the two Augusti, were in charge of Oriens and Italia et Africa respectively. Galerius and Constantius, the two Caesars, were in charge of Illyricum and Galliae respectively
diocletian
Diocletian divided the empire
Diocletian did not divide the Roman Empire into eastern and western halves. The division called "east" and "west" was an artificial division concocted by historians in order to clarify their writings. In fact, Diocletian divided the empire into four parts, not two.Diocletian did not divide the Roman empire into eastern and western halves. The division called "east" and "west" was an artificial division concocted by historians in order to clarify their writings. In fact, Diocletian divided the empire into four parts, not two.Diocletian did not divide the Roman empire into eastern and western halves. The division called "east" and "west" was an artificial division concocted by historians in order to clarify their writings. In fact, Diocletian divided the empire into four parts, not two.Diocletian did not divide the Roman empire into eastern and western halves. The division called "east" and "west" was an artificial division concocted by historians in order to clarify their writings. In fact, Diocletian divided the empire into four parts, not two.Diocletian did not divide the Roman empire into eastern and western halves. The division called "east" and "west" was an artificial division concocted by historians in order to clarify their writings. In fact, Diocletian divided the empire into four parts, not two.Diocletian did not divide the Roman empire into eastern and western halves. The division called "east" and "west" was an artificial division concocted by historians in order to clarify their writings. In fact, Diocletian divided the empire into four parts, not two.Diocletian did not divide the Roman empire into eastern and western halves. The division called "east" and "west" was an artificial division concocted by historians in order to clarify their writings. In fact, Diocletian divided the empire into four parts, not two.Diocletian did not divide the Roman empire into eastern and western halves. The division called "east" and "west" was an artificial division concocted by historians in order to clarify their writings. In fact, Diocletian divided the empire into four parts, not two.Diocletian did not divide the Roman empire into eastern and western halves. The division called "east" and "west" was an artificial division concocted by historians in order to clarify their writings. In fact, Diocletian divided the empire into four parts, not two.
If you are referring to the Roman Empire, no one split it into two pieces or two parts. The emperor Diocletian divided it into four parts which was called the tetrarchy. It was later historians that gave the false impression that the empire was split.
He divide the empire into two halves and shared his power with a co-emperor.
Diocletian's successors continued his policy of State control of the empire's economy. His division of the empire into two parts helped set up the long existence of the Byzantine empire in the East. In the long run however, Diocletian's reforms, slowed down, but could not prevent the western half of the empire to survive.
He divide the empire into two halves and shared his power with a co-emperor.
If you are referring to the Roman empire, no one split it into two pieces or two parts. The emperor Diocletian divided it into four parts which was called the tetrarchy. It was later historians that gave the false impression that the empire was split.
Constantine split the Roman Empire into the Holy Roman Empire and the Byzantine Empire. It should be noted however that the emperor Diocletian (284-305 AD ) made this easier as he was the first to divide the empire into two parts, a western and eastern empire to be ruled separately. The emperors who followed Constantine, Julian and Theodosius I, made permanent the division of the Roman Empire into an eastern and western half.
There was no emperor that divided the Roman empire into two. The emperor Diocletian divided the empire into four, which was called a tetrarchy. There were 2 Caesars and 2 Augustii and they were all answerable to Diocletian.There was no emperor that divided the Roman empire into two. The emperor Diocletian divided the empire into four, which was called a tetrarchy. There were 2 Caesars and 2 Augustii and they were all answerable to Diocletian.There was no emperor that divided the Roman empire into two. The emperor Diocletian divided the empire into four, which was called a tetrarchy. There were 2 Caesars and 2 Augustii and they were all answerable to Diocletian.There was no emperor that divided the Roman empire into two. The emperor Diocletian divided the empire into four, which was called a tetrarchy. There were 2 Caesars and 2 Augustii and they were all answerable to Diocletian.There was no emperor that divided the Roman empire into two. The emperor Diocletian divided the empire into four, which was called a tetrarchy. There were 2 Caesars and 2 Augustii and they were all answerable to Diocletian.There was no emperor that divided the Roman empire into two. The emperor Diocletian divided the empire into four, which was called a tetrarchy. There were 2 Caesars and 2 Augustii and they were all answerable to Diocletian.There was no emperor that divided the Roman empire into two. The emperor Diocletian divided the empire into four, which was called a tetrarchy. There were 2 Caesars and 2 Augustii and they were all answerable to Diocletian.There was no emperor that divided the Roman empire into two. The emperor Diocletian divided the empire into four, which was called a tetrarchy. There were 2 Caesars and 2 Augustii and they were all answerable to Diocletian.There was no emperor that divided the Roman empire into two. The emperor Diocletian divided the empire into four, which was called a tetrarchy. There were 2 Caesars and 2 Augustii and they were all answerable to Diocletian.
The Empire had become too large to control in a pre-mechanical transport and pre-electronic communications age. He split it into four parts, the two larger - east and west - ruled by their own emperor, the two lesser ones by a caesar. This gave each ruler a manageable area to control.
One way that Diocletian tried to save the Roman Empire was by dividing the Empire into two halves, West and East.