0
United States v. The Amistad happened in 1841.
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Name the civil right cases of 1883?
United States v. Stanley; United States v. Ryan; United States v. Nichols; United States v. Singleton; Robinson v. Memphis & Charleston R.R. Co.
What cases cite United States v. Nixon?
United States v. Nixon, 418 US 683 (1974)The following appeals cases cite US v. Nixon, as of December 2009. None of the cases was heard in the Supreme Court of the United States.In Re: Grand Jury v., No. 05-3886 (2007)United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitUnited States v. Banks, (2005)United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth CircuitUnited States v. Moussaoui, (2003)United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitUnited States v. Farias-Camacho, (2003)United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitBrzonkala v. VPI State Univ., (2000)United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOrion Financial v. American Foods Group, (2000)United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitUnited States v. Sobral, (1998)United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitUnited States v. Smith, (1998)United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitIn re: Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum, (1997)United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitUnited States v. Tou Hang, (1996)United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitUnited States v. Leonard A. Pelullu, (1994)United States Court of Appeals for the Third CircuitMarler v. Adonis Health Products, (1993)United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitWilliams v. Lord, (1993)United States Court of Appeals for the Second CircuitIn re United States, (1993)United States Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitIn re Stone, (1993)United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitBaylson v. The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, et al., (1992)United States Court of Appeals for the Third CircuitFriedrich v. US Computer Services, (1992)United States Court of Appeals for the Third CircuitHaitian Centers Council, Inc., et al. v. McNary (1992)United States Court of Appeals for the Second CircuitUnited States v. Concemi (and)United States v. Ribeck, (1993)United States Court of Appeals for the First CircuitUnited States v. Khan, (1990)United States Court of Appeals for the Second CircuitZayas-Green v. Casaine (and)Zayas-Green v. Casaine, et al. (and)Appeal of Davila-Diaz (1990)United States Court of Appeals for the First CircuitUnited States v. Rexach, (1990)United States Court of Appeals for the Second CircuitThomas E. Hoar, Inc., v. Sara Lee Corp., (1989)United States Court of Appeals for the Second CircuitUnited States v. Huerta, (1989)United States Court of Appeals for the Second CircuitState of Maine v. Thomas, (1989)United States Court of Appeals for the First CircuitUnited States v. Rivera-Santiago, (1989) (consolidated)United States v. Cancel-HernandezUnited States v. Edwin Romero-LopezUnited States v. Castro-PoupartUnited States v. Luis Romero-LopezUnited States v. Ortiz-OrtizUnited States Court of Appeals for the First CircuitUnited States v. Frank, (1989)United States Court of Appeals for the Third CircuitIn re Department of Investigation of the City of New YorkUnited States v. Myerson, et al., (1988)United States Court of Appeals for the Second CircuitMarshall v. Lansing, (1988)United States Court of Appeals for the Third CircuitChappee v. Vose, et al., (1988)United States Court of Appeals for the First CircuitUpdate Art, Inc. v. Modiin Publishing, Ltd., (1988)United States Court of Appeals for the Second CircuitChabal v. Reagan, et al., (1988)United States Court of Appeals for the Third CircuitVon Bulow, Auersperg v. Von Bulow, (1987)United States Court of Appeals for the Second CircuitAmeron, Inc., et al. v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, (1987)United States Court of Appeals for the Third CircuitUnited States v. Pecora, (1986)United States Court of Appeals for the Third CircuitCapital Cities Media, Inc. v. Chester, (1986)United States Court of Appeals for the Third CircuitAmeron, Inc., et al. v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, (1986)United States Court of Appeals for the Third CircuitSt. Regis Mohawk Tribe, New York v. Brock, (1985)United States Court of Appeals for the Second CircuitHawkins v. LeFevre, (1985)United States Court of Appeals for the Second CircuitFrisby v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), (1985)United States Court of Appeals for the Third CircuitBogosian v. Gulf Oil Corporation, (1984)United States Court of Appeals for the Third CircuitWilliams v. Pierce, (1983)United States Court of Appeals for the Second CircuitUnited States v. Southard, (1983) (consolidated)United States v. FerrisUnited States v. BankerUnited States v. BrianUnited States v. Anna QuinternoUnited States v. Vincent QuinternoUnited States v. KachougianUnited States v. MartinUnited States v. FalkUnited States v. LauroUnited States Court of Appeals for the First CircuitUnited States v. Hensel, (1983) (consolidated)United States v. CaseUnited States v. DillUnited States Court of Appeals for the First CircuitVazquez v. Secretary of Health and Human Services,(1982)United States Court of Appeals for the First CircuitWilliam T. Thompson Co. v. General Nutrition Corp., Inc.,(1982)United States Court of Appeals for the Third CircuitUnited States v. Cordero, (1982)United States v. SorrenUnited States Court of Appeals for the First CircuitUnited States v. Cuthbertson, et al., (1981)United States Court of Appeals for the Third CircuitUnited States v. Alvarez-Porras, (1981)United States Court of Appeals for the Second CircuitUnited States v. Criden, (1981)United States Court of Appeals for the Third CircuitKelly v. Railroad Retirement Board, (1980)United States Court of Appeals for the Third CircuitUnited States v. O'Neill, (1980)United States Court of Appeals for the Third CircuitRiley v. City of Chester, (1979)United States Court of Appeals for the Third CircuitPettijohn v. Hall, (1979)United States Court of Appeals for the First CircuitUnited States v. RMI Company et al., (1979) (consolidated)NL Industries, Inc. v. SnyderUnited States Court of Appeals for the Third CircuitIrons v. Bell et al., (1979)United States Court of Appeals for the First CircuitUnited States v. Lyles, (1979)United States Court of Appeals for the Second CircuitNational Super Spuds, Inc., et al. v. New York Mercantile Exchange et al., (1979)Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. New York Mercantile ExchangeUnited States Court of Appeals for the Second CircuitUnited States v. Herman (and)United States v. McCann, (1978)United States Court of Appeals for the Third CircuitUnited States v. Arroyo-Angulo (1978)United States Court of Appeals for the Second CircuitUnited States v. DiCarlo, (1977) (consolidated)United States v. MacKenzieUnited States Court of Appeals for the First CircuitKaufman v. Edelstein (and)United States v. International Business Machines Corp.,(1976)United States Court of Appeals for the Second CircuitUnited States v. Glazer, (1976)United States Court of Appeals for the Second CircuitIn re Millow, (1976)United States Court of Appeals for the Second CircuitUnited States v. Trotter, (1976) (consolidated)United States v. NuzzoUnited States Court of Appeals for the Third CircuitFrank Irey, Jr., Inc v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, (1975)United States Court of Appeals for the Third CircuitSmith v. Schlesinger, (1975)United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia CircuitDixon v. 80 Pine Street Corporation et al., (1975)Appeal of Department of Buildings of the City of New YorkUnited States Court of Appeals for the Second CircuitRonson Corporation v. Liquifin Aktiengesellschaft,(1974)United States Court of Appeals for the Second CircuitFor information on United States v. Nixon, (1974), see Related Questions, below.
When was Pete V. Domenici United States Courthouse created?
Pete V. Domenici United States Courthouse was created in 1997.
Former president John Quincy Adams made headlines in 1841 when he defended?
John Quincy Adams defended the defendants in the case United States v. Libellants and Claimants of the Schooner Amistad. They were the African captives who were being transported as property to be sold as slaves.
What was the significance of the guinn v. United States case in 1915?
Guinn v. United States, was an important United States Supreme Court decision that dealt with provisions of state constitutions that set qualifications for voters.
Where did the abrams v United States trial take place?
The United States Supreme Court, Oct. 21, 1919
What is the court case that upheld Executive order 9066 as constitutional?
Hirabayashi v. United States, 320 U.S. 81 (1943) , Yasui v. United States, 320 U.S. 115 (1943) and notably Korematsu v. United States, 323 U.S. 214 (1944) . ~ see links below .
How many will run as v-pres this election 2010?
2010 is not a Presidential election year in the United States. Presidential elections happen every four years starting in 1788.
Has the United States always had the death penalty?
The United States has not always had the death penalty. In 1972 the United States Supreme Court called for a moratorium on the death penalty with the case of Furman v. Georgia and brought it back in 1976 with the case of Gregg v. Georgia.
This trial questioned executive privilege?
United States V. Nixon
Schenck v United States?
(1919) *Congressional War Powers
Who won the Schechter Poultry Corp. Case versus the United States in 1935?
who wn the case with ala schechter v united states
