Giving false or misleading statements to officers is what makes this a crime. If you knowingly hinder an investigating through the use of false information you're more than likely going to be arrested.
Two contradictory stories may be beneficial for the officer as then we knows someone or both are lying about the events. It can be construed as false information if they can prove you purposely gave the officer false information.
Transfering to another department is not a means of clearing departmental accountable officers for official pecuniary liability.
Legally, yes, police officers are able to use deceptive tactics, or lie, in order to receive information. Most officers (and detectives) would agree that lying should be avoided when possible, but there are times when lying is necessary to uncover the truth during an investigation. The fact that the officer lied can be used as a defense in court as possible coercion (which is not always a successful defense), but the officer cannot be held legally accountable for lying.
The plural form is... 'officers in charge'.
The plural of officer is officers.
No, ncc officer is not a gazetted officer.
The correct spelling of the plural of officer is officers.
yes, they can. sometimes criminals go out to try to find these officers to kill them, so this information can be totally confidential.
No. Auxiliary police officers are not officers of the court.
The Certifying Officer shows that the investigation failed to prove negligence.
Take a look at the page below (in related links) for information on Administrative Officers.
No. The purpose of accident investigations is to prevent future accidents. To encourage Soldiers to participate in the investigation, information provided to the accident investigation officer can NOT be used against him during a criminal investigation. Reference: AR 385-40.
Police Officers