Passing on the right is illegal on most roads. As an example, in Michigan, you can only pass on the right if there are three or more lanes going in that direction. Your case would indicate that the driver on the right would have been illegally passing, an indication of fault on their part. However, the person on the left shouldn't turn in to someone, regardless of whether they should be there or not.
If you were legally passing in a marked passing zone and the other vehicle turned left in front of you WITHOUT SIGNALLING THE TURN, I would tend to charge the turning driver with the collision.
IF the driver of the turning vehicle claims that he DID signal his left turn, then YOU would be liable for trying to pass him.
Sounds like this is going to go to court to see who the judge believes, and the insurance companies can battle out the cost of repairs among themselves. Neither of you are going to get out of this without having your insurance rates raised.
No. For example if a driver stops at green light and the driver to his rear hits him, it is the driver in front's fault.
they are at fault because they should have pulled off to the side.
In the UK it is the fault of the driver behind Same here in the USA
In the UK it is the fault of the driver behind Same here in the USA
the driver behind is not at fault as the in front should be liable as he was negligent
Since it was the following car's responsibility to maintain a safe stopping distance from the car in front, the car that rear-ended the stopped vehicle is at fault.
that would be the person that goes into reverse, because as long as you are stopped it is not your fault. the only possible chance of it being your fault is if you are in motion, but even than it would be a technicality that you could be at fault.
the car that hit you in the rear is at fault. think about it this way. What did you do wrong if you were stopped
Who is at fault when a vehicle is hit from behind on a freeway the driver in front for putting on there brakes and whatpenal code does it follow under?
Typically, the driver who hit the middle car will still be at fault, inless it's determined by a police accident report that you were following or parked too closely to the front vehicle. * A process referred to as the chain of causation determines who is at fault in a vehicle accident. In the case cited the driver of the car that created the collision would be responsible for all damages. Any traffic citations given to other driver's involved would have no bearing on the issue of fault.
Nothing, if she as at fault she is responsible to the damages of her car.
If you are completely stopped, the person behind you will be at fault for BOTH cars since they didn't allow themselves enough time and space to stop safely.