Want this question answered?
Practically everyone at one time or another in the past twenty centuries. I'm afraid you are going to have to narrow your question down to get a reasonable answer.
Give authority to another
Corroboration consists of either other evidence OR another witness's testimony backing up and substantiating whatever evidence or testimony that precedeeded it.
perfect, appropriate, fitting, proper, good, justifiable, true, suitable
No. The only LEGALLY justifiable shooting is in self-defense or in defense of another person.
It means you have been asked to confirm that the other employee's testimony is correct and factual.
Not really, justifiable or reasonable reliance on the promise of another can prevent the promisor from offering the defense that there was no consideration for their promise. An enforceable contract requires an offer, an acceptance, and a consideration (or a bargained for exchange). Under the doctrine of Promissory Estoppel, a promise can be held enforceable as a quasi-contract when it would be reasonably foreseeable to the promisor that the promisee would detrimentally rely on their promise. In that case the promisor would be liable to the promisee for reliance damages and possibly even expectancy damages.
"Murder" is illegal. You'd have to convince a jury that it was "justifiable homicide" and there was no other choice.
Reasonable is another word for plausible!! :)
To corroborate is to confirm. If you are corroborating the testimony of another employee, it means that you are formally stating that what this other employee said is correct, to the best of your knowledge. It could aslo be an indictment of the collusion of perjury.
Rational-legal authority
Be AA critic to them