Want this question answered?
Even if only a small percentage of the total blame is assigned to the licensee, the licensee may still have to pay for all of the damages of someone injured by an intoxicated person.
An intoxicated person is someone who has drunk too much alcohol, and is drunk. Probably staggering about, unsure of where or what he or she is doing.
A person sues the bartender who served the intoxicated guest who injured him
There is no single first sign that a person is intoxicated. It works differently on everyone. I have known people who get louder, get happier, get sadder, get angry or just get sleepier.
A Doctor is a someone who helps the person injured
You either are, or you are not intoxicated. There is no in between as far as the law is concerned.
False. It may make someone feel less intoxicated, but it doesn't actually make them less intoxicated, nor does it balance out the effects.
If that person still understands the legal consequences of the contract, it is legally enforceable. If that person is intoxicated to the point that he or she lacks mental competency, the contract is voidable at by the intoxicated person, even if the intoxication was voluntarily.
It would hurt the person that is injured even more
The way the person chooses to wave the flag.
driving while intoxicated
someone who has a psion