answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

appeal to a lack of evidence

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

AnswerBot

6d ago

The logical fallacy being committed in this scenario is known as an ad hominem attack. This fallacy involves attacking the character of the person making the argument rather than addressing the actual points being made in the argument. It is considered invalid because it does not address the substance of the argument itself.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: When the premise of an argument relies on mention of the character background or personality of a person what is the logical fallacy being committed?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Philosophy

What is a fallacy in which a claim or argument is rejected the basis of some unrelated fact about the person presenting the argument?

Ad Hominem fallacy - it occurs when an argument is rebutted by attacking the person making the argument rather than the argument itself. This fallacy is committed when one tries to refute an argument by attacking the person's character, motive, or other attribute.


What is an ad hominem fallacy?

An ad hominem fallacy is when an argument attacks a person's character or traits instead of addressing the actual issue being discussed. It is considered a logical fallacy because attacking the person making an argument does not invalidate the argument itself.


What is an example of an ad hominem fallacy?

An example might be : "How can you talk about winning the war when you yourself received a deferment from the draft?"


What tactic attacks the speaker not his reasoning?

Ad hominem attack, which occurs when someone responds to an argument by attacking the person making the argument rather than addressing the points they are making. This tactic aims to divert attention from the argument itself by discrediting the character or attributes of the speaker.


How is ethos used in an argument?

Ethos is used in an argument by appealing to the credibility and authority of the speaker or the source of information. By establishing a strong ethos, the speaker can build trust with the audience and increase the persuasiveness of their argument. This can be done through showing expertise, experience, and honesty on the topic being discussed.

Related questions

What does antigone and ismene argument reveal about the personality of each character?

what does thier argument reveal about the personality of each character


The argument against heredity determine personality?

you get some of your personality from your parents. as you get older, you become more unique.


What logical fallacy redirects the audience's focus from the actual argument to the character of the person supporting it?

An "ad hominem" argument.


What logical falilacies redirects the audience's focus from the actual argument to the character of the person supporting it?

A ad-hominem argument is a logical facilities. This is when the audience are focus on he argument.


How is ethos used in an argument?

Ethos is used in an argument by appealing to the credibility and authority of the speaker or the source of information. By establishing a strong ethos, the speaker can build trust with the audience and increase the persuasiveness of their argument. This can be done through showing expertise, experience, and honesty on the topic being discussed.


What if your argument by providing excerpts of primary sources when writing a research report?

most of your background


If throughout an opening argument jurors are reminded of the good character of the accused they are being led by anthemed hook?

A. character


If throughout an opening argument jurors are reminded of the good character of the accused they are being led by an themed hook?

character


If throughout an opening argument jurors are reminded of the good character of the accused they are being led by an hemed hook?

Character


If throughout an opening argument jurors are reminded of the good character of the accused they are being led by at hemed hook?

character


What should you not do when evaluating an opponents supporting points?

Ignore any good argument stratagies - APEX


If throughout an opening argument jurors are reminded of the good character of the accused they are being led by a n -themed hook?

character