The Only Possible Argument in Support of a Demonstration of the Existence of God was created in 1763.
The ontological argument of the exsitance of god is supported by abrahmic religions. It is not widely practiced in the current day.
The argument by design, also known as the teleological argument, posits that the complexity and order in the universe suggest the presence of an intelligent designer. It argues that the intricate design and purpose in nature imply the existence of a creator or higher power. This argument is often used to support the existence of God or some form of intelligent being behind the universe.
Evidence to support the argument is needed for a sound argument.
Evidence to support the argument.
evidence to support the argument
Advocacy- Active Support or argument for a cause
Answer this question… To restate the central point of the argument and make a final bid for the audience's support
An inductive argument is characterized by its support rather than its ability to conclusively prove its conclusion. Inductive reasoning involves drawing general conclusions based on specific observations or evidence, which may support a conclusion but not guarantee its truth.
They didn't necessarily 'support' the existence, though sightings of Bigfoot has been handed down generations.
The conclusion of an argument serves to summarize the main points presented in the argument, reiterate the main claim or thesis, and provide a sense of closure to the discussion. It offers the final opportunity to persuade the audience by restating the key reasons and reinforcing the validity of the argument.
An argument (thesis,idea or theory) which is opposite to one already proposed. A counterargument is an argument, with factual evidence or other kinds of support, that challenges either your thesis or a major argument for it.
No, if it did it wouldn't be science.