No this is a secondary source. A primary sourced is something written in documents or by authors of the time of the subject of the study.
it is a primary source
A "primary source" is a description of the event written by the people who experienced it. A "secondary source" is a description written by people who read the books that the primary-source people wrote. So, a "primary source" for the Battle of Bunker Hill would be written by the soldiers who fought the battle or who observed it first-hand. Each person saw only a PART of the battle; the part he was involved in. Even for such a small battle as Bunker Hill, no one person saw it all; some things were happening on the other side of the hill. A "primary source" can also be written by asking questions of people who were there. The "Secondary sources" read the books that the eye-witness observers and participants wrote, sometimes decades later.
Primary source.
Yes, it is it comes from another person. It depends. A quote from a person who experienced your topic would be a primary source.
A primary source is a source material that is closely related to the subject discribed with in.
The use of an artifact as a primary source is different than the use of a written primary source because when you exacavate for an artifact, you may have to make guesses. However, with a written primary source, you don't need to guess as the writing inside will have the answers to your questions or guesses.
Primary Source - Apex Learning
It depends on what you need it for :)
i think they are a primary source.... yes it is a primary source
It is a primary source because it came directly from him. An analysis of the speech written by a columnist would be a secondary source.
Primary Source: a firsthand account, also something written by someone who was there. Secondary source: a secondhand account also something written by someone who was not there.
Primary source: A historical document written by an eyewitness; secondary source: a historical document interpreting the accounts of eyewitnesses
No, a primary source is a contemporary account. To write it now creates a secondary source.
written or created by a person who experienced an event
No, a book written this year about life on a Spanish mission in Florida would not be considered a primary source, as it is a modern interpretation or analysis of historical events. Primary sources are original documents or artifacts that provide firsthand evidence of a specific time period or event.
A primary source for Joan of Arc could be anything written or painted about her in her time 1412-1431.