Want this question answered?
The use of chemical weapons during the first World War ; see relevant link below .
Since the US could NOT use atomic weapons (and doctrine dictated no use of chemical/bio weapons); the US used every other weapon that it had at it's disposal. Another words, until someone said "it couldn't be used"; IT WAS USED! As far as napalm being used in warfare; it's a fire weapon...and fire has been part of warfare since the ancient Greeks used it before Christ (BC).
well tanks were bad because nobody knew how to use them tactically to gain an advantage which caused a deadlock which meant millions of soldiers died and the other new weapon of the time was chemical warfare which lets be honest is just bad
Trench warfare was one type, and one which was used more than it had been in any previous war (and maybe since then). Also, things such as gas attacks are classed as well as use of tanks to invade enemy territory and fighter planes.
They use 4 weapons in the battle of Shiloh
Biochemical Warfare is war using weapons of a biological or chemical nature. such as biotoxins. Anthrax bombs are a good example of bichemical weapons. To use weapons of mass distruction.
Julian Perry Robinson has written: 'Public Health Response to Biological and Chemical Weapons' 'The effects of weapons on ecosystems' -- subject(s): Biological warfare, Chemical warfare, Environmental aspects, Environmental aspects of Biological warfare, Environmental aspects of Chemical warfare, Environmental aspects of Military weapons, Environmental aspects of Nuclear weapons, Environmental aspects of War, Military weapons, Nuclear weapons, War 'The United States binary nerve-gas programme' -- subject(s): Asphyxiating and poisonous Gases, Chemical weapons, Military policy, War use 'Chemical and biological warfare developments, 1985' -- subject(s): Biological warfare, Chemical warfare
Weapons such as poison gas were developed as a reaction to the stalemate that occurred throughout most of the war.
The use of chemical weapons has been banned by international treaty, but that does not prevent some countries from using it, particularly on their own people in an attempt to control their populations. There has also been discussion as to what chemical warfare is. Some include the use of tear gas as chemical warfare, while most just consider it as a useful crowd control device without lasting effects.
in world war 1 Germany introduced the use of chemical weapons for instance the Mustard Gas artillery shells, theses weapons where mainly used by countries on there side.
Yes, smoke grenades, marking rounds, rockets, and various forms of flame weapons were used in Vietnam (along with CS gas). But officially the US did not deploy chemical warfare in Vietnam. During the Viet era; US doctrine was: 1. Never to deploy biological weapons 2. Use chemical warfare only in self defense (meaning the other nation had to use it first) 3. Reserved the right of first strike with nuclear weapons
Very probable Al-Qaeda don't use chemical weapons.
Legal for use in warfare? Yes.
The use of chemical weapons during the first World War ; see relevant link below .
Th Chemical Weapons Convention was ratified by Morocco at 29.04.1997.
No. During that war it was US doctrine to utilize chemical warfare only for retaliation; the US would not use it first. Biological warfare was not US doctrine. Not to be used. The US reserved the right to "first strike" with nuclear weapons.
There are many reasons like to destroy the forests so troops could locate the Viet Cong. To create military bases on which to station forces and supplies, also for the snipers that hide in the trees