0
Here's an answer from The Bible for you: Romans 3:5-8 says: But if our unrighteousness commend the righteousness of God, what shall we say? Is God unrighteous who taketh vengeance? (I speak as a man) God forbid: for then how shall God judge the world? For if the truth of God hath more abounded through my lie unto his glory; why yet am I also judged as a sinner? And not rather, (as we be slanderously reported, and as some affirm that we say,) Let us do evil, that good may come? whose damnation is just.
Wiki User
∙ 15y ago
Wiki User
∙ 14y agoi think it says when you would do good evil is always present
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Where do you find 'where this is good evil is always present' in the King James version?
Romans 7:21 - I find then a law, that, when I would do good, evil is present with me. (KJV)
Is there more good than evil?
There would not be good without evil. Try to keep in mind that good and evil are only the words we use to describe how we perceive something. An action that one person might consider to be evil, another might think to be good. Anything that is not physical dose not 'have to be' anything.I suppose the answer would be No, but there is more to it when you think about it. Hope this helped.
Is It good to call someone evil?
Not always, no.
When you would do good evil is always present?
This quote highlights the idea that there is always the potential for evil to arise, even when good actions are being taken. It serves as a reminder that one must remain vigilant against negative influences and be prepared to face challenges, even when doing good deeds. Ultimately, it underscores the ongoing struggle between good and evil in the world.
Is there good consequences for evil acts?
Not at all.It is impossible. if it is true that a n evil act has good consequence there is no evil act exists.An evil act will always consequence a bad and evil end.
Are witches always evil?
No. Many work for the good of mankind
The theme of James and the Giant Peach?
good always conquers evil. :-)
In an epic war between good and evil which side would you join?
It would depend on WHO is defining "good" and "evil." Remember, Hitler thought his side was "good".
Would there be Good without Evil?
in a world with no evil you must have a world with no good. therefor yes there would be no meaning.It's like Yin & Yang, no evil means no good and vice versa, so I'd say yes.No. As it turns out, people tend not to think through decisions in terms of "is this good" or "is this evil" - but rather in terms of "how does this affect my long term capability to continue to survive?" On the whole, people tend towards the "cooperation" aspect of things because we're a lot better at getting stuff done when we spread the workload around."Good" and "Evil" would have the same real value they have always had. None.Things would still arise like someone asking what the object on the table was:''A container of things' would be a good answer,'A bowl of fruit' would be a better answer, and'A glass bowl containing oranges' would be the bestanswer (at leat, of these choices). 'Good' and 'Evil' are adjectives, not nouns.
What is the purpose of the possibility of evil?
Without evil there would be no good. The opposites are needed.
What is the moral story of Mahabharata?
Even though evil gains in the short term victory or "Jaya" is always for the good. Incidentally Mahabharata is called "Jaya'depicting victory of good over evil.
Is darrius from Mortal Kombat good or evil?
As always, whether any character is good or evil is how you look at it. But from a hero-lover's standpoint, he's somewhere in the middle
