Want this question answered?
The consequences for a slave owner killing their slave varied based on the time and place. In some instances, there may have been legal repercussions such as fines or imprisonment, but enforcement and punishment were often lax when it involved a slave. Additionally, the social norms of the time often supported or justified violence against slaves, making it less likely for a slave owner to face significant consequences for killing their slave.
The cost of buying freedom as a slave varied greatly depending on the time period, location, individual circumstance, and the slave owner's willingness to sell. In some cases, slaves were able to save money over time or negotiate their freedom through labor or services rendered. Other times, the price was set at a fixed amount based on market conditions or the perceived value of the slave.
Yes, in some historical contexts, slaves were able to buy their freedom through self-purchase agreements with their masters or through accumulating savings over time. However, the ability for a slave to buy their freedom was often limited by economic barriers or legal restrictions imposed by the society in which they lived.
During a slave auction, enslaved individuals were brought to a public space where they were inspected by potential buyers. Auctioneers would then start the bidding, and the highest bidder would win ownership of the enslaved person. The enslaved person had no say in the matter and would be forced to go with the winning bidder.
Slave owners had complete control and ownership over their slaves, including the right to buy, sell, and lease them as property. They determined where slaves lived, what work they did, and could use physical punishment to discipline them. Slaves had no legal rights and were considered mere chattel under the law.
You don't have to pay slaves for their work and they work for as long as you tell them to work. You also could buy slave labour cheaply as there were plenty of black slaves brought from africa.
The slave could work and get payed and buy there self out. The slave could work normally and live. The slave could escape to Canada and live.
People that would buy a slave would buy them because they needed work to be done. They were called, "slave owners". Slavery is now illegal. The Civil War fought against slavery.
Slave trade was when people would buy slaves and have them work on their lands.
Anything that is hard to do and very messy anything mining,farming,cooking,babysitting anything a slave is made t odo what the owner wants it to do,if you want it to die you can jsut buy one and kill it for fun,if you want to f#ck it you can buy it and f#ck it all you want a slave does anything you want it to do.
i think its no because when slave were exist it was black people only so they said people go to buy slave all of them were Africans.
download or buy it.
A loyal slave was the best to have. Remember that the slaves in ancient Rome were used for what was needed. If a person were a farmer, a slave who could do farm work was the best to have; he certainly would not go out and buy a slave who was an accountant to do farm work. If a person had a lot of writing and correspondence, such as Cicero, he would have a secretary like Tyro who was the best to have. In general, any slave who fit his master's needs was the best to have.A loyal slave was the best to have. Remember that the slaves in ancient Rome were used for what was needed. If a person were a farmer, a slave who could do farm work was the best to have; he certainly would not go out and buy a slave who was an accountant to do farm work. If a person had a lot of writing and correspondence, such as Cicero, he would have a secretary like Tyro who was the best to have. In general, any slave who fit his master's needs was the best to have.A loyal slave was the best to have. Remember that the slaves in ancient Rome were used for what was needed. If a person were a farmer, a slave who could do farm work was the best to have; he certainly would not go out and buy a slave who was an accountant to do farm work. If a person had a lot of writing and correspondence, such as Cicero, he would have a secretary like Tyro who was the best to have. In general, any slave who fit his master's needs was the best to have.A loyal slave was the best to have. Remember that the slaves in ancient Rome were used for what was needed. If a person were a farmer, a slave who could do farm work was the best to have; he certainly would not go out and buy a slave who was an accountant to do farm work. If a person had a lot of writing and correspondence, such as Cicero, he would have a secretary like Tyro who was the best to have. In general, any slave who fit his master's needs was the best to have.A loyal slave was the best to have. Remember that the slaves in ancient Rome were used for what was needed. If a person were a farmer, a slave who could do farm work was the best to have; he certainly would not go out and buy a slave who was an accountant to do farm work. If a person had a lot of writing and correspondence, such as Cicero, he would have a secretary like Tyro who was the best to have. In general, any slave who fit his master's needs was the best to have.A loyal slave was the best to have. Remember that the slaves in ancient Rome were used for what was needed. If a person were a farmer, a slave who could do farm work was the best to have; he certainly would not go out and buy a slave who was an accountant to do farm work. If a person had a lot of writing and correspondence, such as Cicero, he would have a secretary like Tyro who was the best to have. In general, any slave who fit his master's needs was the best to have.A loyal slave was the best to have. Remember that the slaves in ancient Rome were used for what was needed. If a person were a farmer, a slave who could do farm work was the best to have; he certainly would not go out and buy a slave who was an accountant to do farm work. If a person had a lot of writing and correspondence, such as Cicero, he would have a secretary like Tyro who was the best to have. In general, any slave who fit his master's needs was the best to have.A loyal slave was the best to have. Remember that the slaves in ancient Rome were used for what was needed. If a person were a farmer, a slave who could do farm work was the best to have; he certainly would not go out and buy a slave who was an accountant to do farm work. If a person had a lot of writing and correspondence, such as Cicero, he would have a secretary like Tyro who was the best to have. In general, any slave who fit his master's needs was the best to have.A loyal slave was the best to have. Remember that the slaves in ancient Rome were used for what was needed. If a person were a farmer, a slave who could do farm work was the best to have; he certainly would not go out and buy a slave who was an accountant to do farm work. If a person had a lot of writing and correspondence, such as Cicero, he would have a secretary like Tyro who was the best to have. In general, any slave who fit his master's needs was the best to have.
it is a killstreak. you have to buy it for 2000 COD points. it is a 3 kill streak
The consequences for a slave owner killing their slave varied based on the time and place. In some instances, there may have been legal repercussions such as fines or imprisonment, but enforcement and punishment were often lax when it involved a slave. Additionally, the social norms of the time often supported or justified violence against slaves, making it less likely for a slave owner to face significant consequences for killing their slave.
Not me
they decided that they should have the slaves be able to work extra hours and get paid a little so the slave could have money to buy goods.