0
What else can I help you with?
The supreme court case of munn v Illinois decided that?
the granger laws were legal
The supreme court case of munn v . Illinois showed that?
Farmers had political power
The Supreme Court case of munn vs Illinois showed what?
Supreme Court case of Munn v Illinois showed that states need to regulate certain businesses
Was the Sherman Antitrust Act Created in response to Munn v Illinois?
No, The result was The Interstate Commerce Commission.
What did the supreme court case of Munn v Illinois decided on?
The Granger laws were legal.
What was the US Supreme Court case Munn v. Illinois about?
Munn v. Illinois, 94 US 113 (1877)The question that the case was concerned with was whether a state could regulate charges for grain elevators. This is expanded - using the idea that a state has the right to regulate commerce within that state - to the fact that if a private utility is used in the public good, it should be regulated by the state, as the state is acting on behalf of the people's interest.Granger laws were legal...Apex...:)
What groups were involved in this case the landmark Supreme Court decision Munn v Illinois?
no the chinese are secretly using them as bombs to destroy the united states
What did the supreme court case of Munn v. Illinois give states the right to regulate?
government to set prices over some private businesses.
What is the importance of the Munn vs Illinois case?
Absolutely nothing.
What does the case of Munn v Illinois gave states the right to regulate?
Munn v. Illinois, 94 US 113 (1877)The US Supreme Court defined certain private businesses as "private utilities" operating in the public interest, and gave the States the right to regulate the prices they charged their customers. Munn specifically addressed the use of grain elevators, but the Court's decision applied the regulatory rights across a broad spectrum of industries, including railroads, that operated intrastate.
How was wabash different from the earlier cases of munn and peik?
Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co. v. Illinois (1886) differed from earlier cases like Munn v. Illinois (1877) and Peik v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co. (1876) in its emphasis on interstate commerce. While Munn and Peik upheld state regulation of businesses affecting public interest, Wabash ruled that states could not regulate interstate railroads, asserting that such authority belonged to the federal government. This marked a shift towards recognizing the limitations of state power in matters of interstate commerce.
Which supreme court ruling declared that grange laws were constitutional because railroads provided a public service and therefore were not completely private?
Munn v. Illinois (1877) was the supreme court ruling that declared that grange laws were constitutional. The decision was based on the argument that railroads provided a public service and therefore were not completely private.
