Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)
The Supreme Court case referred to as Miranda v. Arizonais actually four different lower court cases that were consolidated for hearing in the Supreme Court. Mr. Miranda himself was arrested in Phoenix, Arizona. The other three included two state cases from California and New York, and one federal case against the United States.
For more information, see Related Questions, below.
1966
Miranda v. Arizona
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)
Miranda v. Arizona
Miranda v. Arizona
Ernesto Miranda was arrested and charged with rape in 1963. The case bearing his name, which overturned his conviction, was decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1966. Miranda was retried on evidence that didn't include his confession, and convicted again.
It affirmed the right to an attorney and was a case that led to the Miranda Rights that came about in Miranda vs Arizona.
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)Ernesto Miranda was the plaintiff; the state of Arizona was the defendant. In a court case, the plaintiff/petitioner's name is always listed first, and the defendant/respondent's name is listed last.
Miranda v. Arizona
The Miranda rights themselves are a part of the amendments to the Constitution. They became "the Miranda rights" and it was required that they be read to suspects in 1966. This was decided in the supreme court case Miranda v. Arizona.
There is no requirement to advise arrested persons of their rights. The trigger for advice or rights under Miranda V Arizona is 'custodial interrogation'. A person arrested but not questioned is usually not advised of rights, but a person who is being questioned and is not free to leave, whether or not they are arrested must be advised.
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)Miranda vs. Arizona