I do not ' believe ' in evolution, but I am convinced by the evidence.
"The evidence for evolution countervails over the arguments against it." THis means that evidence for evolution counteracts the arguments against it.
Fossils can be used as evidence for evolution because they can show the development of a species over a long period of time.
Actually, it is the strongest evidence for evolution. Without one fossil we would know from the DNA evidence that evolution has occurred and is occurring. It is in the DNA of organisms that we see the strongest evidence for common ancestry. The products of those genes are sometimes highly conserved down the ages. Ribosomes, the workbenches on which proteins are made, differ hardly at at between you and pets.
swag bissh
direct evidence is the observation as it occurs
It does hint at common ancestry so it is "evidence" of evolution.
Evolution
In evolution the study of vertebrate forelimbs is related to the anatomical evidence from homology.
how does adaptations give evidence for evolution?
In evolution the study of vertebrate forelimbs is related to the anatomical evidence from homology.
Sure ... just find real evidence.
Yes, the fossil record is considered a valid and significant piece of evidence for evolution. Fossils provide a record of past life forms and show a progression of species over time, supporting the idea that organisms have changed and diversified through evolutionary processes. Additionally, the discovery of transitional fossils helps to fill in gaps and provide connections between different groups of organisms.
Monkeys
Because adaptations are an observed effect of evolution. They could not happen if evolution did not occur.
I do not ' believe ' in evolution, but I am convinced by the evidence.
A classic way to disprove evolution by means of fossils would be to find a fossil rabbit in Pre-Cambrian sedimentary rocks. Of course, that can never happen.